Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

International relations
Reference:

The Role of ASEAN and Vietnam in Counter-Terrorism

Chan Zui Tkhan'

ORCID: 0000-0002-2203-2957

PhD in History

Postgraduate Student, Department of Theory and History of International Relations, Russian People’s Friendship University

117198, Russia, Moscow, Miklukho-Maklaya str., 6

myhoney292@gmail.com
Ionov Egor Maksimovich

PhD in History

Student of the Department of Theory and History of International Relations of People's Friendship University of Russia

117198, Russia, Moscow, Miklukho-Maklaya str., 6

egor.ionov.01@mail.ru

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0641.2023.1.39746

EDN:

EJKPBS

Received:

07-02-2023


Published:

12-03-2023


Abstract: This study examines the role of Vietnam in the fight against terrorism. The study focuses on the activities of the Association of South-east Asian Nations (ASEAN) and its member VietNam in the area of counter-terrorism, radicalism and extremism. The authors examine in detail the legal framework of ASEAN’s counter-terrorism activities: the ASEAN Convention on Counter-Terrorism, the ASEAN Comprehensive Plan of Action on Counter-Terrorism, ASEAN plan of action to prevent and counter the rise of radicalisation and violent extremism (POA PCVE). Moreover, close attention is given to the activities of specialized bodies: ASEAN Ministerial Meetings on Transnational Crime (AMMTC), Senior Officials Meeting on Transnational Crime (SOMTC), ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF), the Intersessional Meeting on Terrorism and Transnational Crime (ISM on CTTC). The main conclusions of the study are the establishment of activities of the Association of South-east Asian Nations (ASEAN) in the field of counter-terrorism, the definition of the role of Vietnam in the fight against terrorism, radicalism and extremism, Analysis of Viet Nam’s cooperation with various international organizations on counter-terrorism issues and identification of further necessary actions of Vietnam aimed at improving the fight against terrorism. The relevance of the study is due to the increased level of terrorist threat in the world and in the region of South-East Asia in particular. This study is based on the theory of political realism, which views international relations as an eternal confrontation between States defending their national interests. In the process of studying this problem, the authors apply institutional, analytical and problem-chronological methods.


Keywords:

ASEAN, Terrorism, Vietnam, Convention, Cooperation, UN, SOMTC, AMMTC, ARF, ISM on CTTC

This article is automatically translated. You can find original text of the article here.

IntroductionThe relevance of the research topic is due to the widespread spread of the terrorist threat around the world and in the countries of Southeast Asia, in particular.

As a negative socio-political phenomenon, terrorism is becoming a serious destabilizing factor that has a destructive impact on almost all spheres of society. The degree of influence of existing terrorist organizations in the world is obvious, which increases from year to year. Moreover, the following trend of modern terrorism is becoming more and more relevant: the expansion of its social base, the involvement in political extremist activities of a significant part of the population (especially among young people), which is associated with the activation of terrorist manifestations, the expansion of opportunities to create a more extensive infrastructure of terrorist organizations, the emergence of additional difficulties for identifying and suppressing terrorist acts, their activities performers and organizers. Terrorists are increasingly using the Internet to incite extremist sentiments in society and conduct recruitment work.

The chronological framework of the study covers the period from 2002 to 2022. The lower limit of the study is due to the creation of an inter-sessional meeting on counter-terrorism and transnational crime (inter-sessional meeting on counter-terrorism and transnational crime - ISM on CTTC) within the framework of the ASEAN regional forum (ARF). The upper limit of the study covers 2022, when the anti-terrorism training center was established under the Ministry of Public Security of Vietnam. The selected period is very long and full of cause-and-effect relationships and events that allow us to trace the activities of ASEAN and Vietnam, in particular, in countering terrorism.

The object of the study is the fight against terrorism.

The subject of the study is the activities of ASEAN and Vietnam, in particular, in countering terrorism.

The objectives of the study are to establish concrete steps on the part of ASEAN and Vietnam, in particular, in the field of countering terrorism, and to assess the effectiveness of the previously mentioned steps.

To achieve these goals , it was necessary to solve the following main tasks:

1. To consider the causes of terrorism on the territory of the ASEAN States;

2.                 Analyze the ASEAN Convention on Combating Terrorism;

3.                 To study the ASEAN Action Plan to prevent and counter the growth of radicalization and violent extremism;

4. Review the Bali Work Plan adopted at the 13th ASEAN Ministerial Meeting in 2019.;

5.                 To identify the actual terrorist activity in the ASEAN States;

6.                 To draw up a list of necessary actions for the ASEAN States in order to eradicate terrorism.

The theoretical and methodological basis of the research includes institutional, analytical and problem-chronological methods. This study is based on the theory of political realism, which considers international relations as an eternal confrontation between states defending their national interests.

The source base of the study. The presented work is based on the following types of sources: journalistic, clerical and statistical.

Journalistic sources include an article by the United Nations on the topic of foreign terrorist fighters, an article on the website of the Hanoi Today news agency covering Vietnam's aspirations to implement the UN Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy.

Clerical sources include the ASEAN Convention on Combating Terrorism, Senior Officials Meeting on Transnational Crime (SOMTC) - meeting of senior officials on transnational crime, international law on terrorism and legal perfection in Vietnam - international law on terrorism and legal improvement in Vietnam.

Statistical sources include Global Terrorism Index reports on the number of terrorist attacks in Southeast Asian countries, on the overall level of terrorist danger in the region and in each country in different years.

The degree of study of the chosen topic depends primarily on the source base and literature. Both domestic and foreign authors have studied this problem in depth.

The problem of the evolution of the terrorist threat in the countries of Southeast Asia is revealed in the work of Chalk P., Rabasa A., Rosenau W., Piggott L.

The problem of regional security is revealed in the works of Rogozhina N.G., Chanto S.D. and R?land J.

The scientific novelty of this study is to combine the available information about the activities of ASEAN and Vietnam, in particular, in the field of combating terrorism. This work allows you to get acquainted with the prerequisites for the growth of the terrorist threat in the Southeast Asian region, the methods used by ASEAN and Vietnam, in particular, against the growth of terrorism, specific recommendations aimed at reducing the terrorist threat.

                 ASEAN counter-terrorism activities                 Terrorism is the greatest threat to all countries and peoples of the world, as well as an obstacle to progress and development.

 The growing trend of indiscriminate terrorist activity against innocent people regardless of nationality, race, citizenship and religion has become a matter of great concern for all countries of the world. From the point of view of the law, terrorism is a criminal offense that must be combated in order to create a healthy, peaceful and progressive society.

Events related to terrorism at the international level have also had an impact on Southeast Asia. The attack on the United States in 2001 was an incentive for the increase and strengthening of terrorist groups around the world. Problems such as political and economic instability, a weak Government and security system, the existence of extremist groups, local rebels and militants, problems of unity and ethnic clashes, as well as external factors are considered as serious sources of problems for the defense system of the countries of the region.

The problem of terrorism is becoming more complicated and poses increasing threats to the ASEAN member States. The development of the Internet and social networks has led to the expansion of the network of global and regional groups, as well as to new models of radicalization. The emergence of lone terrorists and regional groups who have sworn allegiance to Daesh/ISIS -the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (an organization banned in the Russian Federation), as well as the return of foreign terrorist fighters (IBT) [1] remain the main problems for ASEAN [2]

One of the key steps of ASEAN in combating terrorism is the adoption and implementation of the ASEAN Convention on Combating Terrorism [3] and the ASEAN Comprehensive Plan of Action on countering terrorism [4]. The Convention provides a framework for regional cooperation in countering, preventing and suppressing terrorism in all its forms and manifestations and deepening cooperation between law enforcement agencies and relevant State authorities in counter-terrorism activities.

Areas of cooperation under the convention may, in accordance with the domestic law of the country concerned, include appropriate measures to:

1.                  Taking the necessary steps to prevent the commission of terrorist acts, including by timely informing other member States of the Association;

2.                  Preventing the use of the territories of Member States by those who finance, plan, facilitate or commit terrorist acts against other States and/or civilians of another country;

3.                 Prevention and suppression of the financing of terrorist acts;

4.                 Preventing the movement of terrorists or terrorist groups through effective border control and control over the issuance of identity cards and travel documents, as well as through measures to prevent the forgery or fraudulent use of identity cards and travel documents;

5.                  To promote the development of joint counter-terrorism capacity through training and regional meetings;

6.                  Raising public awareness about terrorism and the role of its participation in the fight against terrorism, as well as strengthening interfaith and intra-confessional dialogue;

7.                 Strengthening cross-border cooperation;

8. Enhanced intelligence sharing and information sharing;

9.                 Strengthening existing cooperation in the development of regional databases within the competence of the relevant ASEAN bodies;

10.            Strengthening the capacity and readiness to combat chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear terrorism, cyberterrorism and any new forms of terrorism;

11.            Conducting research and developing counter-terrorism measures;

12.             Encouraging the use of videoconferencing facilities for court proceedings, where appropriate;

13.            Ensuring the inevitability of punishment of persons involved in the financing, planning, preparation or commission of terrorist acts or in support of terrorist acts.

The member States of the Association cooperate in addressing the root causes of terrorism and the conditions conducive to its spread, in order to prevent the commission of terrorist acts and the spread of terrorist cells. The previously mentioned Convention was signed by Vietnam on January 13, 2007, and ratified on February 25, 2011.   

In 2018, the 12th ASEAN Ministerial Meeting on Transnational Crime (AMMTC) adopted the ASEAN Action Plan to Prevent and Counter the Growth of Radicalization and Violent Extremism (POA PCVE) for 2018-2025. This plan is aimed at strengthening cooperation among ASEAN member States in four priority areas:

1.                  Preventing the growth of radicalism and violent extremism;

2.                  Countering radicalization and promoting deradicalization;

3.                 Enforcement of laws and strengthening of national legislation related to countering radicalism and violent extremism;

4.                 Partnership and regional cooperation.

In 2019, the 13th ASEAN Ministerial Meeting adopted the POA PCVE 2019-2025 work plan, also known as the Bali Work Plan, for which the Senior Officials Meeting on Transnational Crime (SOMTC) is responsible. The purpose of this plan is a comprehensive and holistic policy guidance for the 19 ASEAN sectoral bodies/entities responsible for the association's policy in the field of combating radicalism and violent extremism in the region [5].

 Cooperation in the fight against terrorism is mentioned in the SOMTC work program for the implementation of the previously mentioned POA PCVE plan. The work programme focuses on the exchange of information and best practices, including de-radicalization; rehabilitation and re-education of terrorists and violent extremists; scientific research; raising public awareness and countering terrorism; promoting joint operational activities, including with relevant ASEAN sectoral bodies; capacity-building activities for law enforcement and criminal justice officials, as well as institutions engaged in combating the financing of terrorism; the development of cooperation with external partners.

 In the defense sector, cooperation focuses on combating chemical, biological and radiological terrorism; maritime terrorism; and urban terrorism. This cooperation is facilitated by the exchange of information and events, such as seminars and joint exercises to build joint capacity in the fight against terrorism.

Within the framework of the ASEAN regional forum (ARF), the issue of combating terrorism is discussed at the inter-sessional meeting on counter-terrorism and transnational crime (inter-sessional meeting on counter-terrorism and transnational crime - ISM on CTTC) [6]. Established in 2002, ISM on CTTC pursues the following goals:

1. Formulation of a common policy on combating terrorism and related transnational crimes for national and joint implementation by ARF participants;

2.                  Assessment of the state of counter-terrorism actions and cooperation in combating transnational crime in the region in order to identify priority areas for consideration and policy development.

The AMTC also adopted the Manila Declaration on Countering the Growth of Radicalism and Violent Extremism, proclaiming:

1.                 Continued exchange of information and best practices among ASEAN members on countering and preventing radicalism and extremism;

2.                 Continuation of mutual legal assistance in criminal cases related to the growth of radicalization and violent extremism, and the extradition of terrorists themselves in accordance with the domestic laws of the ASEAN member States;

3. Development of a comprehensive, evidence-based approach to addressing the threats of the growth of radicalism and violent extremism;

4.                 Strengthening existing mechanisms to combat terrorism, radicalism and violent extremism, including through regular regional dialogue, for example, through coordination of relevant law enforcement agencies to exchange analyses, factors, root causes and risk assessments in order to strengthen national and regional counter-terrorism policies;

5. Enhance cooperation with ASEAN dialogue partners, relevant international organizations and other stakeholders through the exchange of experiences, lessons learned and best practices in the fight against radicalism and violent extremism.

Since 2014, ASEAN has also been striving to respond to regional threats posed by militants who had previously been recruited from among their citizens to participate in the conflicts in Iraq and Syria and returned to their homeland [7].

The ASEAN decisions, with the exception of the 2007 Convention, are advisory in nature and are non-binding, but they play a significant role in regional and international counter-terrorism activities aimed at achieving the United Nations global counter-terrorism strategy.

Summarizing all the above, we can conclude that ASEAN's counter-terrorism activities are quite productive: the ASEAN Convention on Combating Terrorism (2007), the ASEAN Comprehensive Action Plan on Countering Terrorism (2017), the ASEAN Action Plan and work Plan "Preventing and Countering the Growth of Radicalization and Violent Extremism" (2018-2025) were adopted.However, ASEAN's counteraction to terrorism is not as effective: according to the Global Terrorism Index Score [8], the most economically and politically strong states of the association remain vulnerable to terrorist attacks. For example, the Philippines ranks 16th in the "The impact of terrorism" rating, Thailand - 22, Indonesia - 24, Malaysia - 63, and Vietnam - 85.

Moreover, based on the data of the previously mentioned resource, you can also see the number of terrorist acts in the countries of the association: Philippines – 62, Indonesia – 16, Thailand – 14.

 

Vietnam's counter-terrorism activitiesVietnam is making efforts to implement the UN Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy and international obligations in the fight against terrorism, stressing that it also closely cooperates with international organizations and other countries.

Vietnam has joined 15 global conventions and many regional and bilateral agreements on combating terrorism and transnational crimes [9].

Vietnam has also signed bilateral treaties on mutual legal assistance in criminal matters and extradition with more than 40 countries, has become a party to the Convention against Transnational Organized Crime and the Protocol on the Prevention and Suppression of Human Trafficking.

Vietnam attaches great importance to national obligations under UN Security Council resolutions on combating terrorism, includes provisions on this issue in many relevant legal documents and is constantly improving the capacity of law enforcement agencies, including through the establishment of a counter-terrorism training center under the Ministry of Public Security in February 2022.

In 2013 Vietnam has adopted a law on combating terrorism, which establishes a legal framework for more effective fight against terrorism in Vietnam and the promotion of international cooperation for this purpose [10].

At the regional level, Vietnam and other ASEAN member States continue to make collective efforts at both the national and regional levels to combat international terrorism.

As a member of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, Vietnam joins forces with other ASEAN members in implementing the ASEAN Convention on Combating Terrorism and the comprehensive plan of Action to Counter Terrorism. Vietnam works closely with ASEAN members through various regional mechanisms, such as the ASEAN Senior Officials Meeting on Transnational Crime (SOMTC), the ASEAN Ministers Meeting on Transnational Crime (AMMTC) and the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) to discuss and cooperate on issues related to combating terrorism, violence and extremism.

Vietnam also actively participates in counter-terrorism cooperation projects and seminars initiated within the framework of ASEAN, APEC (Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation), ASEM (Asia-Europe Meeting), ASEAN-Japan, ASEAN-Russia Dialogues, etc.

Terrorism in all its forms and manifestations today still represents one of the most serious threats to the international community. The world continues to suffer from monstrous terrorist acts carried out using increasingly sophisticated tactics.

Vietnam shares the serious concern of the international community in the fight against terrorism and takes an uncompromising position towards terrorism. Given the complex nature and unpredictable trajectory of international terrorism, Viet Nam stresses the urgent need for a coordinated and unified approach to effectively combat terrorism at both the regional and international levels.

Vietnam, pursuing its policy aimed at eradicating terrorism, unfortunately, has not achieved significant success: according to the Global Terrorism Index Score in 2011, Vietnam was ranked 116th in the "The impact of terrorism" rating, since there was not a single terrorist attack in the state in 2011 [11]. In 2016 Vietnam was ranked 130th also with 0 terrorist attacks [12]. In 2019 Vietnam has risen to 97th place in the "Influence of Terrorism" rating [13], and in 2022 Vietnam has risen to 85th place.

As you can see, despite the productive activities of the Vietnamese government in the field of countering terrorism, the danger of terrorist attacks still remains, moreover, Vietnam has been gradually rising in the rating of "the influence of terrorism" over the years, which characterizes Vietnam's policy in the field of countering terrorism as insufficiently effective.

ConclusionStates and the international community should develop cooperation at the global and regional levels.

  In this regard, the fight against terrorism must be conducted in accordance with the purposes and principles of the UN Charter and international law. At the same time, it is extremely important to address all issues related to addressing the root causes of international terrorism, including political, economic and social inequality and injustice around the world.

The activities of the Association of Southeast Asian Countries and Vietnam, in particular, in the field of countering terrorism can be considered quite productive: the ASEAN Convention on Combating Terrorism (2007), the ASEAN Comprehensive Action Plan on Countering Terrorism (2017), the ASEAN Action plan and work plan "Preventing and Countering the Growth of Radicalization and Violent Extremism" (2018-2025). As an ASEAN member, Vietnam joins forces with other members of the association in implementing the ASEAN Convention on Combating Terrorism and the Comprehensive Plan of Action to Counter Terrorism. Viet Nam works closely with Member States through various regional mechanisms, such as the ASEAN Senior Officials Meeting on Transnational Crime (SOMTC), the ASEAN Ministers Meeting on Transnational Crime (AMMTC) and the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) to discuss and cooperate on issues related to combating terrorism, violence and extremism.

However, this productivity of the counter-terrorism activities of ASEAN and Vietnam, in particular, has little effect on its effectiveness: the terrorist danger in the region remains at a fairly high level: the most developed states in the region are still in danger of terrorist acts that occur with enviable regularity.

Due to the continuing terrorist threat in the region, the member States of the association need to:

1.                To carry out systematic monitoring of terrorist activity in the region to ensure the development of targeted and evidence-based measures to counteract;

2.                To develop, modify and implement legislation, policies and strategies to combat terrorism and its financing in accordance with international standards and best practices;

3. Build the capacity of government agencies and non-governmental actors to respond to cases of terrorism and terrorist financing in accordance with human rights principles and standards based on the rule of law;

4.                 Strengthen regional and international cooperation mechanisms.

References
1. Foreign terrorist fighters. URL: https://www.un.org/counterterrorism/foreign-terrorist-fighters (accessed: 25.01.2023)
2. Chalk, P., Rabasa, A., Rosenau, W., Piggott, L. (2009). The Evolving Terrorist Threat to Southeast Asia. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
3. ASEAN Convention on Counter Terrorism. URL: https://sherloc.unodc.org/cld/ru/treaties/status/association_of_southeast_asian_nations/asean_convention_on_counter_terrorism.html (accessed: 25.01.2023)
4. Rogozhina, N.G. (2019). ASEAN - Regional Counter-Terrorism Cooperation. Yugo-Vostochnaya Aziya: aktual’nyye problemy razvitiya, 1 (1(42)), 76-83.
5. Senior Officials Meeting on Transnational Crime (SOMTC). URL: https://asean.org/senior-officials-meeting-on-transnational-crime-somtc/ (accessed: 25.01.2023)
6. Chanto, S.D. (2004). The ASEAN Regional Forum – The Emergence of ‘Soft Security’ : Improving the Functionality of the ASEAN Security. Dialogue + Cooperation, 3, 41-47.
7. Rüland, J. (2005). The Nature of Southeast Asian Security Challenges. Security Dialogue, 4 (36), 545-563.
8. Global Terrorism Index 2022. URL: https://www.visionofhumanity.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/GTI-2022-web-04112022.pdf (accessed: 09.02.2023)
9. Vietnam strives to implement UN global counterterrorism strategy. URL: http://hanoimoi.com.vn/tin-tuc/Doi-ngoai/1043779/viet-nam-no-luc-thuc-hien-chien-luoc-chong-khung-bo-toan-cau-cua-lien-hop-quoc (accessed: 25.01.2023)
10. international law on terrorism and legal perfection in Vietnam. URL: https://iadllaw.org/files/Pham%20Thi%20Chung%20Thuy%20INTERNATIONAL%20LAW%20ON%20TERRORISM%20AND%20LEGAL%20PERFECTION%20IN%20VIETNAM.pdf. (accessed: 25.01.2023)
11. Global Terrorism Index 2012. URL: https://reliefweb.int/report/world/2012-global-terrorism-index-capturing-impact-terrorism-2002-2011 (accessed: 28.02.2023)
12. Global Terrorism Index 2016. URL: https://reliefweb.int/report/world/global-terrorism-index-2016 (accessed: 28.02.2023)
13. Global Terrorism Index 2019. URL: https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/5818180/mod_resource/content/1/Global%20Terrorism%20Index.pdf (accessed: 28.02.2023)

First Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The subject of the peer-reviewed study is the activities of Vietnam and other ASEAN countries in the field of combating terrorism. Given the continuing high level of terrorist threat in the world, the relevance of the article cannot be overestimated. Unfortunately, the author did not bother to think over the theoretical and methodological foundations of his research, which could not but affect the quality of the results obtained. From the context, it can be understood that in addition to general scientific analytical methods, a historical and institutional approach was used (when analyzing specific institutions regulating the interaction of ASEAN countries in the field of countering terrorism), as well as a critical conceptual and content analysis of official regulatory documents and declarations. However, the lack of a research goal, a clear understanding of the scientific problem that was solved during the research, as well as the methodological basis, led to the problematic novelty of the results obtained. Despite the rather rich factual material attracted by the author for the study, the conclusions that he made as a result look either banal or unsubstantiated. The first group includes the following conclusions: - "Vietnam is actively involved in the fight against terrorism"; - "Vietnam joins forces with other members of the association ... in countering terrorism"; - "Viet Nam cooperates closely with Member States through various regional mechanisms." After reading these conclusions, you involuntarily wonder whether it was worth "building a garden" for the sake of such self-evident conclusions? Some novelty is felt in the recommendations that the author of the reviewed work formulated (for whom? – rec.) in conclusion. However, it is completely unclear what these recommendations are based on. It was not possible to find the grounds for the formulation of these recommendations in the conducted analysis. In the final part of the article, the author should pay more attention to the representation of the results obtained by him with an emphasis on their scientific novelty, and in the substantive part of the article describe the prerequisites that allowed him to formulate recommendations for improving the fight against terrorism, as well as indicate the addressee of these recommendations. The lack of theoretical and methodological reflection also affected the structure of the article. In addition to the traditional "Introduction" and "Conclusion", the text highlights only one section, "ASEAN and Vietnam's activities in the field of combating terrorism." The very fact of allocating a single section raises questions about its expediency. Especially if this single section actually repeats the title of the article. If the author had thought through the scientific problem, as well as the methodological means of solving it, then he would not have had problems in forming the structural logic of the work: it would simply reflect the main aspects of the conducted research. Stylistically, the reviewed work makes a positive impression. There are some minor typos in the text (for example, a sentence that does not begin with a capital letter: "the convention provides a basis for regional cooperation in the field of countering ..."; etc.), as well as stylistic ones (for example, a cumbersome construction that is difficult to understand: "... Including the provision of early warning to other Member States through the exchange of information"; etc.) errors. But in general, it is written quite competently, in a good scientific language, with the correct use of scientific terminology. The bibliography includes 9 titles, including sources in foreign languages. But in the absence of a description of the scientific problem under study, it is not possible to judge the representativeness of the bibliographic list. Appeal to opponents: it is absent due to the lack of theoretical and methodological reflection. GENERAL CONCLUSION: the article proposed for review at this stage of its preparation can be qualified for work that only partially meets the requirements for scientific papers. The text is made in an informative and encyclopedic style instead of a problem-scientific one. In general, the topic chosen by the author may be of interest to political scientists, sociologists, conflict scientists, specialists in public administration, world politics and international relations, as well as for students of the listed specialties. The sound empirical material collected by the author, as well as the conclusions drawn, correspond to the subject of the journal "International Relations". However, the article needs to be finalized: - to formulate the scientific problem to which the study is devoted, as well as its purpose and objectives; - to analyze existing approaches to solving the problem and justify their own theoretical and methodological choice; - to think over the structure of the article so that it reflects the main aspects of the research; - to present the results in conclusion with an emphasis on their scientific novelty. After eliminating the comments made, the article can be recommended for publication.

Second Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

For the article Vietnam's role in the fight against terrorism, the title partly corresponds to the content of the article materials. The title of the article conditionally looks at the scientific problem, which the author's research is aimed at solving. The reviewed article is of relative scientific interest. The author partly explained the choice of the research topic and partly justified its relevance. The article incorrectly formulated the purpose of the study ("In this regard, the study of the activities of ASEAN and Vietnam as its member in countering terrorism is of particular importance, which is the purpose of the study"), the object and subject of the study are not specified. The author listed the methods used by him. In the reviewer's opinion, the main elements of the "program" of the study were not fully thought out by the author, which affected its results. The author did not present the results of the analysis of the historiography of the problem and did not formulate the novelty of the undertaken research, which is a significant disadvantage of the article. In presenting the material, the author selectively demonstrated the results of the analysis of the historiography of the problem in the form of links to relevant works on the research topic. There is no appeal to opponents in the article. The author did not explain the choice and did not characterize the range of sources involved in the disclosure of the topic. The author did not explain or justify the choice of the chronological and geographical framework of the study. In the opinion of the reviewer, the author sought to use the sources competently, to maintain the scientific style of presentation, to use the methods of scientific knowledge competently, to observe the principles of logic, systematicity and consistency of the presentation of the material. As an introduction, the author said that "terrorism poses the greatest threat to all countries," etc., pointed to some "trends in modern terrorism", as well as some "sources of problems for the defense system of countries" in Southeast Asia. The author summarized that "the problem of terrorism is becoming more complicated and poses increasing threats to the ASEAN member states." In the first section of the main part of the article ("ASEAN activities in the field of combating terrorism") The author reported that "one of the key steps of ASEAN in combating terrorism is the adoption and implementation of the ASEAN Convention on Combating Terrorism and the ASEAN Comprehensive Plan of Action on countering terrorism," etc. The author listed the objectives of cooperation "within the framework of the convention" and stated that "the member States of the association cooperate in addressing the root causes of terrorism and conditions conducive to its spread, in order to prevent the commission of terrorist acts and the spread of terrorist cells," etc. The author named 4 "priority areas" in which, in accordance with the ASEAN Action Plan to Prevent and counter the growth of radicalization and violent extremism, "cooperation among ASEAN member States is being strengthened," then said that in 2019 additionally adopted the "Bali Work Plan, for which the Meeting of Senior Officials on Transnational Crime is responsible", etc. ("The purpose of this plan is comprehensive and holistic policy guidance for 19 ASEAN sectoral bodies/entities"), described the content of the "SOMTC work program for the implementation of the previously mentioned POA PCVE plan". The author further reported that "within the framework of the ASEAN regional forum, the issue of combating terrorism is being discussed at an inter-sessional meeting on combating terrorism and transnational crime," listed the objectives of this meeting, briefly described the contents of the "Manila Declaration on Countering the Growth of Radicalism and Violent Extremism." The author summarized that "the ASEAN decisions, with the exception of the 2007 Convention, are of a recommendatory nature and are non-binding, but they play a significant role in regional and international counter-terrorism activities," etc. It remains unclear exactly what research task the author sought to implement in this section. The author once mentioned Vietnam in the first section of the main part of the article: "The previously mentioned convention was signed by Vietnam on January 13, 2007." In the second section of the main part of the article ("Vietnam's activities in the field of combating terrorism") The author reported that "Vietnam is making efforts to implement the UN Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy and international obligations in the fight against terrorism," etc., that "Vietnam has also signed bilateral treaties on mutual legal assistance in criminal matters and extradition with more than 40 countries," etc., and that "Vietnam attaches great importance to national obligations under Council resolutions The UN Security Council on Combating Terrorism includes provisions on this issue in many relevant legal documents," etc. The author further explained that "as a member of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, Vietnam joins forces with other ASEAN members in implementing the ASEAN Convention on Combating Terrorism and the Comprehensive Plan of Action on countering Terrorism," etc., "actively participates in cooperation projects in the fight against terrorism and seminars initiated within the framework of ASEAN," the author unexpectedly stated that "in recent years the world has made real progress in international cooperation in the fight against terrorism," "however, terrorism in all its forms and manifestations today still represents one of the most serious threats to the international community," etc., and that "Vietnam shares the serious concern of the international community in the fight against terrorism and takes an uncompromising position towards terrorism," etc. The article contains minor typos, such as: "2011", "2018-2025", etc. The author's conclusions are generalizing. The conclusions do not allow us to evaluate the scientific achievements of the author within the framework of his research. In the final paragraphs of the article, the author unexpectedly reported that "it is extremely important to deal with all issues related to eliminating the root causes of international terrorism, including political, economic and social inequality and injustice around the world," then that "the activities of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations and Vietnam, in particular, in the field of countering terrorism can be considered quite productive" because "the ASEAN Convention on Combating Terrorism (2007), the ASEAN Comprehensive Plan of Action on Countering Terrorism (2017), the ASEAN Action Plan and work plan on Preventing and Countering the Growth of Radicalization and Violent Extremism (2018-2025) were adopted." The author listed "regional mechanisms" in which Vietnam "closely cooperates" with ASEAN member states, and suddenly named countries that "remain vulnerable to terrorist attacks," reported "the number of terrorist acts in the association countries." As a summary, the author suggested that "the member States of the association" "carry out systematic monitoring of terrorist activity in the region to ensure the development of targeted and evidence-based counteraction measures", "develop, modify and implement legislation, policies and strategies to combat terrorism and its financing in accordance with international standards and best practices" etc . The conclusions, in the opinion of the reviewer, do not clarify the purpose of the study. In the reviewer's opinion, the potential purpose of the study has been partially achieved by the author. The publication may arouse the interest of the magazine's audience. The article requires significant revision, first of all, in terms of formulating the key elements of the research program and their corresponding conclusions.

Third Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

Review of the article "The activities of ASEAN and Vietnam, in particular, in the fight against terrorism." The subject of the study is the activities of ASEAN and Vietnam, in particular, in the fight against terrorism. The purpose of the article is "to establish concrete steps on the part of ASEAN and Vietnam in the field of countering terrorism, evaluating the effectiveness" of measures taken to prevent terrorism and combat terrorism. The research methodology is based on institutional, analytical and problem-chronological methods. The reviewed article is based on the theory of political realism founded by Hans Morgenta. The theory of political realism considers "international relations as an eternal confrontation between states defending their national interests." The relevance of the topic is obvious, since terrorism and extremism are currently one of the most serious threats to security and a significant destabilizing factor that has a destructive effect on almost all spheres of society. In Southeast Asia, the threat of terrorism is also present. The expansion of the base of terrorism, the spread of ideas of extremism, radicalism through the Internet, young people, due to age characteristics, maximalism, lack of life experience, fall under the influence of various terrorist groups Scientific novelty. The reviewed article has all the signs of novelty. It analyzes the "activities of ASEAN and Vietnam in the field of combating terrorism" on a wide range of sources. The article provides a comprehensive analysis of the "prerequisites for the growth of the terrorist threat" in the region under study and "specific recommendations aimed at reducing the terrorist threat." Style, structure, content. The style of writing the reviewed article is scientific, but at the same time accessible to understanding not only by specialists, but also by a wide readership. The structure of the work is built competently and is aimed at achieving the research goal. The structure consists of an introduction, which shows the relevance, chronological framework, methodology, sources, as well as a historiographical analysis of the topic. The main part consists of two sections: ASEAN's counter-terrorism activities and Vietnam's counter-terrorism activities. The conclusion of the work presents the conclusions obtained in the course of work on the topic under study. The content of the work corresponds to the title and purpose of the article. The bibliography of the article includes 13 positions (articles in English and Russian) and indicates that the author is well aware of the problem being analyzed. The appeal to the opponents is presented at the level of the information collected during the work on the topic of the article, systematization and analysis of sources and literature, specific recommendations aimed at reducing the terrorist threat. These recommendations, according to the reviewer, are quite universal and relevant, they can be applied in the fight against terrorism in other regions. Conclusions, the interest of the readership. The conclusions of the article are objective and follow from the work carried out by the author. The author notes that "States and the international community should develop cooperation at the global and regional levels. In this regard, the fight against terrorism must be conducted in accordance with the purposes and principles of the UN Charter and international law. At the same time, it is extremely important to address all issues related to addressing the root causes of international terrorism, including political, economic and social inequality and injustice around the world." Noting that "the activities of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations and Vietnam, in particular, in the field of countering terrorism can be considered quite productive," specific measures taken to counter terrorism are listed. At the same time, the author of the reviewed article writes that the productivity of the measures taken turned out to be ineffective and offers a number of specific recommendations. The article is written on an urgent and important topic, it may be of interest to readers of the magazine and all those who are interested in the fight against terrorism not only in Southeast Asia, but also in other regions.