Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

History magazine - researches
Reference:

Degtyareva A.D. To a Problem of Genesis of Metal Working in the Sintashta and Petrovka Cultures of South Ural

Abstract: Today there is need for a comparison of materials on morphology, the chemical composition, manufacturing techniques of an inventory complex of non-ferrous metals of cultures in connection with domination of the point of view about successive development between tribes of Sintashta and Petrovka Cultures has ripened. The obtained analytical data on metalproduction of cultures conflict to the statement about the Sintashta sources of Petrovka metalproduction. Collected data disprove this assumption and give the chance to connect development of metalproduction at a boundary of average-late bronze with several lines of development of processing of non-ferrous metal in a Yamna-poltavka and catacomb communities. The article’s conclusions are based on the mass results derived from the atomic emission spectroscopy (at the Institute of Inorganic Chemistry at the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences), X-ray fluorescence (at the Institute of Archaeology at the Russian Academy of Sciences) (405 products) and metallographic (at the Institute for the Study of the Northern Expansion at the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 320 products) analyses.The morphological review of metal collections of the beginning of a late bronze age in the territory from Don to Ishim shows use of identical instruments of labor not only at the Sintashta and Petrovka tribes, and in much wider area of a steppe and forest-steppe strip of Eastern Europe, the Urals, Kazakhstan that is explainable from the point of view of emergence of epoch-making standard stereotypes of metalproduction of the West Asian province going the sources to the previous Yamna-poltavka and catacomb periods of early and average bronze. Features of technological traditions of Sintashta and Petrovka production are quite explainable the previous trends of development of metalproduction during of early and average bronze. In Sintashta Culture orientation to production traditions of steppe Yamna-poltavka and catacomb tribes of Northern Black Sea and Ciscaucasia in the use of predominantly low-alloy arsenic bronzes under the domination of the forging technique that uses low-temperature metal working.Petrovka blacksmiths, similar to Don-Volga Abashevo masters, continued the stable tradition of the Ural Yamna-Poltavka blacksmiths of handling pure copper, including oxidised copper with the use of casting and forging techniques.


Keywords:

South Ural, Bronze Age, Petrovka culture, Sintashta culture, nonferrous metal production, metallography, Ancient technologies, nonferrous metal typology, morphology, technological traditions


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Chernykh E. N. Kargaly: fenomen i paradoksy razvitiya. Kargaly v sisteme metallurgicheskikh provintsiy. Potaennaya (sakral'naya) zhizn' arkhaichnykh gornyakov i metallurgov // Kargaly. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury, 2007. T. 5. 200 s.
2. Molodin V. I., Epimakhov A. V., Marchenko Zh. V. Radiouglerodnaya khronologiya kul'tur epokhi bronzy Urala i yuga Zapadnoy Sibiri: printsipy i podkhody, dostizheniya i problemy // Vestnik NGU. Seriya: Istoriya, filologiya. 2014. T. 13. Vyp. 3: Arkheologiya i etnografiya. S. 136–167.
3. Chernykh E. N., Orlovskaya L. B. Radiouglerodnaya khronologiya kul'tur Zapadnoy Evrazii v epokhu rannego metalla // Estestvennonauchnye metody issledovaniy i paradigma sovremennoy arkheologii: Materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchnoy konferentsii, Moskva, 8–11 dekabrya 2015. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury, 2015. S.8–18.
4. Vinogradov N. B. Stepi Yuzhnogo Urala i Kazakhstana v pervye veka II tys. do n. e. (pamyatniki sintashtinskogo i petrovskogo tipa). Chelyabinsk: Abris, 2011. 175 s.
5. Epimakhov A. V. Yuzhnoe Zaural'e v epokhu sredney bronzy. Chelyabinsk: Izdatel'stvo YuUrGU, 2002. 170 s.
6. Tkachev V. V. Stepi Yuzhnogo Priural'ya i Zapadnogo Kazakhstana na rubezhe epokh sredney i pozdney bronzy. Aktobe: Aktyubinskiy oblastnoy tsentr istorii, etnografii i arkheologii, 2007. 384 s.
7. Vinogradov N. B. Mogil'nik bronzovogo veka Krivoe Ozero v Yuzhnom Zaural'e. Chelyabinsk: Yuzhno-Ural'skoe knizhnoe izdatel'stvo, 2003. 362 s.
8. Gening V. F., Zdanovich G. B., Gening V. V. Sintashta: arkheologicheskie pamyatniki ariyskikh plemen uralo-kazakhstanskikh stepey. Chelyabinsk: Yuzhno-Ural'skoe knizhnoe izdatel'stvo, 1992. 408 s.
9. Drevnee Ust'e: ukreplennoe poselenie bronzovogo veka v Yuzhnom Zaural'e / Otv. red. N. B. Vinogradov. Chelyabinsk: Abris, 2013. 482 s.
10. Epimakhov A. V. Rannie kompleksnye obshchestva severa Tsentral'noy Evrazii. Chelyabinsk: Chelyabinskiy dom pechati, 2005. 192 s.
11. Zdanovich G. B. Bronzovyy vek Uralo-Kazakhstanskikh stepey. Sverdlovsk: Ural'skiy universitet, 1988. 184 s.
12. Kupriyanova E. V., Zdanovich D. G. Drevnosti lesostepnogo Zaural'ya: mogil'nik Stepnoe VII. Chelyabinsk: Entsiklopediya, 2015. 196 s.
13. Potemkina T. M. Bronzovyy vek lesostepnogo Pritobol'ya. M.: Nauka, 1985. 376 s.
14. Tkachev A. A. Tsentral'nyy Kazakhstan v epokhu bronzy. Tyumen': Tyumenskiy neftegazovyy universitet, 2002. Ch. 1. 289 s.
15. Degtyareva A.D. Drevnee metalloproizvodstvo Yuzhnogo Zaural'ya. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2010. 162 s.
16. Vinogradov N. B., Degtyareva A. D., Kuz'minykh S. V. Metallurgiya i metalloobrabotka v zhizni obitateley ukreplennogo poseleniya Ust'e 1 // Vestnik arkheologii, antropologii i etnografii. 2013. ¹ 3 (22). S. 4–30.
17. Chernykh E. N. Metall i drevnie kul'tury: Uzlovye problemy issledovaniya // estestvennonauchnye metody v arkheologii. M.: Nauka, 1989. S. 14–30.
18. Chernykh E. N., Kuz'minykh S. V. Drevnyaya metallurgiya Severnoy Evrazii. M.: Nauka, 1989. 320 s.
19. Kalieva S. S., Logvin V. N. Mogil'nik u poseleniya Bestamak (predvaritel'noe soobshchenie) // Vestnik arkheologii, antropologii i etnografii. 2008. ¹ 9. S. 32–58.
20. Logvin V. N. Mogil'nik Tokanay 1 i problema sootnosheniya «petrovskikh» i «sintashtinskikh» pamyatnikov // Zapadnaya i Yuzhnaya Sibir' v drevnosti. Barnaul: Izdatel'stvo Altayskogo universiteta, 2005. S. 190–194.
21. Logvin A. V., Shevnina I. V. Kurgan Khalvay 3 (predvaritel'noe soobshchenie) // Margulanovskie chteniya 2011. Materialy mezhdunarodnoy arkheologicheskoy konferentsii. Astana: ENU imeni L. N. Gumileva, 2011. S. 291–296.
22. Morgunova N. L., Evgen'ev A. A., Kuptsova L. V. Pogrebal'nyy kompleks sintashtinskogo vremeni na poselenii Maloyuldashevo I v Zapadnom Orenburzh'e // Arkheologiya, etnografiya i antropologiya Evrazii. 2015. ¹ 2 (43). S. 64–71.
23. Rovira S. Tekhnologiya vyplavki medi v epokhu pozdney bronzy na Kargalakh // Rossiyskaya arkheologiya. 2005. ¹ 4. S. 79–83.
24. Ryndina N. V. Drevneyshee metalloobrabatyvayushchee proizvodstvo Yugo-Vostochnoy Evropy. M.: Editorial URSS, 1998. 288 s.
25. Degtyareva A. D., Grushin S. P., Shaykhutdinov V. M. Metalloobrabotka naseleniya eluninskoy kul'tury Verkhney Obi (predvaritel'nye rezul'taty metallograficheskogo issledovaniya) // Vestnik arkheologii, antropologii i etnografii. 2010. ¹ 2 (13). S. 27–35.
26. Degtyareva A. D., Kuz'minykh S. V. Rezul'taty analiticheskogo issledovaniya metallicheskikh izdeliy mogil'nika Satyga XVI // Satyga XVI: seyminsko-turbinskiy mogil'nik v taezhnoy zone Zapadnoy Sibiri. Ekaterinburg: Ural'skiy rabochiy, 2011. S. 37–44.
27. Gak E.I. Metalloobrabatyvayushchee proizvodstvo katakombnykh plemen stepnogo Predkavkaz'ya, Nizhnego Dona i Severskogo Dontsa: Avtoref. dis. ... kand. ist. nauk. M.: MGU im. M.V. Lomonosova, 2005. 27 s.
28. Kitov E. P. Paleoantropologiya naseleniya Yuzhnogo Urala epokhi bronzy: Avtoref. dis. ... kand. ist. nauk. M.: Institut etnologii i antropologii RAN, 2011. 26 s.