Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

The union of criminalists and criminologists
Reference:

Garmaev Yu.P. Forensic science as an initiator of legal sciences and academic disciplines renewal in terms of the principle of competitiveness

Abstract: The author proves that the forensic science as an applied science can initiate the change and development of the paradigm of all legal sciences and academic disciplines. The current paradigm presumes the supremacy of the so-called “objective” legal position in criminal proceedings, therefore the majority of scientific and academic publications contain this sort of formulations: “The person has committed this or that, and his actions should be assessed only such-and-such, and it can be proved by such-and-such tactical methods, technical means and according to such-and-such procedure…” But whatever decision a practitioner makes, he makes it not as a mere abstract subject of law enforcement, but as a particular role bearer, and this role is always based on a certain corporative and/or competitive interest. The research methodology is based on dialectics, abstraction, analysis, synthesis, deduction, the comparative-legal, formal-legal and the intersectoral legal studies methods. The renewed paradigm is based on the principle of competitiveness of criminal proceedings in Russia and the countries of the European Union, and gives attention to the wide use of three legal positions - the position of the prosecution, the defense and the judge – in the forensic theory and practice. For example, the author considers the position of the investigator (the prosecution) and the peculiarities of his way of thinking: “Do I have the legal reasons, based on the facts which I consider to be established, to conclude about the qualification of crimes and their establishment according to the “most severe variant? What are the weakest points of my position? Will the successful defense change the position of the court?” Here we see a forensic way of thinking within a legitimate legal position, but not an unlawful “prosecutorial bias”. The author suggests to reconsider the traditional approaches of academic forensics and didactics, including the methodology and methods of practical and study guides composing. The proposed paradigm renewal will help the forensic science to acquire a special interdisciplinary status among legal sciences and academic disciplines, increase its applied significance and the attractiveness of its “products” for students and law enforcers. 


Keywords:

expertise, proceedings, prevention, investigation, crime, competitiveness, paradigm, initiator, criminalistics, prosecution


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. «Markin: v Rossii 0,4% opravdatel'nykh prigovorov» // Sayt «Russkaya sluzhba BBC» [Elektronnyy resurs]: // Rezhim dostupa:http://www.bbc.com/russian/russia/2015/01/150120_markin_acquittal_rate_court_russia-Zagl. s ekrana. (data obrashcheniya 01.05.2015).
2. Polishchuk D.A. O neobkhodimosti sovershenstvovaniya rossiyskogo pravosudiya // Rossiyskiy sud'ya.-2013.-¹ 7.-S. 33-34.
3. «V Rossii protsent opravdatel'nykh prigovorov sostavlyaet 0,7%» // Sayt «Rosbalt» [Elektronnyy resurs]: // Rezhim dostupa: http://www.rosbalt.ru/main/2013/10/29/1193878.html-Zagl. s ekrana. (data obrashcheniya 01.05.2016).
4. Chislo opravdatel'nykh prigovorov v Pol'she postepenno snizhaetsya: 2004g. – 13 tys., 2014 g. – 9 tys. prigovorov http://www.rp.pl/artykul/1178745-Reforma-KPK--bedzie-wiecej-wyrokow-uniewinniajacych.html#ap-1
5. Punkt 1 chasti 1 stat'i 7 Federal'nogo zakona «Ob advokatskoy deyatel'nosti i advokature v Rossiyskoy Federatsii» ot 31 maya 2002 g. ¹ 63-FZ (s izmeneniyami ot 13 iyulya 2015 g.) [Elektronnyy resurs] // Rezhim dostupa: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc;base=LAW;n=183241. − Zagl. s ekrana. (data obrashcheniya 01.05.2016). Dalee – Zakon ob advokature.
6. Mikhaylovskaya I. Prava lichnosti – novyy prioritet Ugolovno-protsessual'nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii / I. Mikhaylovskaya // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. – 2002. – ¹ 7. – S. 4.
7. Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 18 dekabrya 2001 g. N 174-FZ (s izmeneniyami ot 30 marta 2016 g.) [Elektronnyy resurs] // Rezhim dostupa: http:// http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_34481/.-Zagl. s ekrana. (data obrashcheniya 01.05.2016).
8. O stepeni kriminalisticheskoy slozhnosti ugolovnogo dela sm.: Zelenskiy V. D. Teoreticheskie voprosy organizatsii rassledovaniya prestupleniy: monografiya. – Krasnodar: KubGAU, 2011. – S. 31-34.
9. Glava 40 UPK RF-Osobyy poryadok prinyatiya sudebnogo resheniya pri soglasii obvinyaemogo s pred'yavlennym emu obvineniem; Glava 40.1. UPK RF - Osobyy poryadok prinyatiya sudebnogo resheniya pri zaklyuchenii dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve.
10. Zdes' i dalee budem govorit' o realiyakh ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva, podrazumevaya, chto podobnaya situatsiya skladyvaetsya i v inykh otraslevykh yuridicheskikh naukakh i uchebnykh distsiplinakh.
11. Odnako situatsiya izmenilas' v svyazi so vstupleniem v zakonnuyu silu Postanovleniya Konstitutsionnogo suda RF ot 2 iyulya 2013 g. ¹ 16-P «Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozheniy chasti pervoy stat'i 237 UPK RF v svyazi s zhaloboy grazhdanina Respubliki Uzbekistan B. T. Gadaeva i zaprosom Kurganskogo oblastnogo suda» (p. 4.1).
12. Baev M. O. Takticheskie osnovy deyatel'nosti advokata-zashchitnika v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossii (teoriya i praktika). Dis… doktora yurid. nauk. – Voronezh. – 2005, i dr.
13. Volchetskaya T. S. Perspektivy i puti razvitiya sovremennoy kriminalistiki // Sovremennoe sostoyanie i razvitie kriminalistiki. Sb. nauch. trudov / Pod red. N. P. Yablokova i V.Yu. Shepit'ko. – Kh.: «Apostil'», 2012. – S. 53 – S. 7.
14. Zashlyapin L. A. Kriminalistika kak osnova razrabotki teoreticheskikh aspektov professional'noy zashchititel'noy deyatel'nosti // Kriminalisticheskie aspekty professional'noy zashchity po ugolovnym delam: Sb. statey / otv. red. L. A. Zashlyapin. – Ekaterinburg, 2001. – S. 43.
15. Baev O. Ya. Osnovy metodiki ugolovnogo presledovaniya i professional'noy zashchity ot nego: nauchno-prakticheskoe posobie (na primere ugolovno-protsessual'nogo issledovaniya dolzhnostnykh i sluzhebnykh prestupleniy). – M.: Eksmo, 2009.-S. 8.
16. Shepit'ko V. Yu. Tendentsii kriminalistiki i nekotorye novelly ugolovnogo protsessa // Kriminal'ne provadzheniya: novatsii protsessual'noi teorii ta kriminalistichnoi praktiki: materiali mizhnarodnoi nauk.-prakt. konf., 18-19 kvitnya 2013 roku, m. Simferopol'-Alushta / vidpov. Red. M. A. Mikhaylov, T. V. Omel'chenko; Tavriyskiy nats. Un-t imeni V. I. Vernadc'kogo. – Simferopol': DIAYPI, 2013.-S. 166. Etu pozitsiyu, dumaetsya, podderzhivayut bol'shinstvo kriminalistov.
17. Eksarkhopulo A. A. Predmet i sistema kriminalistiki: Problemy razvitiya na rubezhe KhKh-KhKhI vekov. – SPb.: Izd. Dom SPbGU, 2004.-S. 33-34.
18. «Yuristov mnogo ne byvaet» // Rossiyskaya gazeta.-Nedelya ¹4959 (135). 2009. 23 iyulya. – S. 6.
19. Shepit'ko V. Yu. Kriminalistika KhKhI veka: predmet poznaniya, zadachi i tendentsii v novykh usloviyakh // Sovremennoe sostoyanie i razvitie kriminalistiki. Sb. nauch. trudov / Pod red. N. P. Yablokova i V.Yu. Shepit'ko. – Kh.: «Apostil'», 2012. – S. 53.
20. Drapkin L. Ya. – Situatsionnyy podkhod – lokal'naya paradigma sovremennoy kriminalistiki // Situatsionnyy podkhod v yuridicheskoy nauke i pravoprimenitel'noy deyatel'nosti: Mat-ly mezhd. nauch.-prakt.konf. / pod red. T. S. Volchetskoy. – Kaliningrad: Izd-vo BFU im. I. Kanta, 2012.-S. 29.
21. Belkin R.S. Kurs kriminalistiki. T.1. M.: Yurist', 1997. – S. 64-69.
22. Shepit'ko V. Yu. Kriminalistika KhKhI veka: predmet poznaniya, zadachi i tendentsii v novykh usloviyakh // Sovremennoe sostoyanie i razvitie kriminalistiki. Sb. nauch. trudov / Pod red. N. P. Yablokova i V.Yu. Shepit'ko. – Kh.: «Apostil'», 2012. – S. 43.
23. Ishchenko E. P., Zhizhina M.V. Sovremennye predstavleniya o predmete nauki kriminalistiki // Situatsionnyy podkhod v yuridicheskoy nauke i pravoprimenitel'noy deyatel'nosti: Mat-ly mezhd. nauch.-prakt.konf. / pod red. T. S. Volchetskoy. – Kaliningrad: Izd-vo BFU imeni I. Kanta, 2012. – S. 62.
24. T. Kun oboznachal eti global'nye protsessy kak nauchnye revolyutsii, prevoznosya torzhestvo novykh paradigm, prikhodyashchikh na smenu ustarevshim. Sm.: Kun T. Struktury nauchnykh revolyutsiy. – M.: «Progress», 1977. – S. 13-19.
25. Garmaev Yu.P., Kirillova A.A. Kriminalisticheskaya metodika sudebnogo razbiratel'stva po ugolovnym delam ob ubiystvakh (ch. 1 st.105 UK RF): teoreticheskie osnovy i prikladnye rekomendatsii (monografiya+prakticheskoe posobie). – M.: Izd-vo «Yurlitinform», 2014. – 280 s
26. Korchagin A. Yu. Organizatsionno-takticheskie i metodicheskie osnovy kriminalisticheskogo obespecheniya sudebnogo razbiratel'stva ugolovnykh del: dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk:12.00.09. – Krasnodar, 2008. – 356 s.