Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law
Reference:

Sidorenko E.L. Successful Practice of Legal Protection of Persons who Report about Corruption Facts

Abstract: This paper analyzes the international experience of legal protection of persons reporting about corruption facts. Main attention is focused on subject composition of persons to be protected, the state guarantees of the security of civil servants and employees in the private sector. According to the legislation of the countries-leaders of the rating of Transparency International (report "Legislation on the Protection of the applicants in the Big Twenty. Priorities for Action") the possibilities of expanding the legal safeguards for the protection of informants in Russia are worked out. On the basis of systematic and comparative legal methods the author divides the research into five main sections: the range of persons to be protected, communication channels, remedies, encouraging of informants and criminal liability for violation of the rights of whistle-blowers. On the basis of a comparison of legal norms and their application the idea that the Western practice in Russia can be applied only in part due to their low efficiency is justified. In particular, the need for narrowing of the range of persons subject to legal protection and non-proliferation of status of informants to the representatives of the individual government agencies is questioned.


Keywords:

corruption, information, informer, legal protection, a person who report about corruption, responsibility, legal guarantees, financial incentives, public employee, official.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Zashchita zayaviteley: luchshie praktiki i khudshie primery // http://www.transparency.org.ru/zashchita-zaiavitelei/ zashchita-zaiavitelei-luchshie-praktiki-i-khudshie-primery
2. Semykina O.I. Tendentsii ugolovnoy politiki gosudarstv – uchastnikov SNG v sfere sovershenstvovaniya zakonoda-tel'stva // Biblioteka ugolovnogo prava i kriminologii. 2015. ¹ 2. S. 18 – 29.
3. Sidorenko E.L. Antikorruptsionnye standarty OESR i ikh realizatsiya v natsional'nom ugolovnom prave (opyt prokhozhdeniya stranami tret'ey fazy otsenki) // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravo-vedeniya. 2014. ¹ 1. S. 85 – 88.
4. Sidorenko E.L. Reformirovanie rossiyskogo antikorruptsionnogo zakonodatel'stva: trebovanie OESR ili pra-vovaya neobkhodimost' // Vestnik MGIMO Universiteta. 2014. ¹ 3. S. 188 – 194.
5. Ceballos v. Garcetti, 361 F.3d 1168, 1173 (9th Cir. 2004).
6. Cloete F. Knowledge management and trust in government: Lessons from South Africa // 7th Global Forum on Reinventing Government: Building Trust in Government 26 – 29 June 2007 Vienna, Austria
7. Dooley K, Cain R.C. Case Summaries: Garcetti v. Ceballos // http://www.radford.edu/content/va-chiefs/home/july-2006/ garcetti-v-ceballos.htm
8. Fire Chief // http://firechief.wpengine.com/
9. Lawson v. FMR LLC. # 12-3 (2014).
10. Malinowski N. Opportunistic NYPD Leaks: Undermining Public Safety and Community Trust // http://www.huffingtonpost. com/news/adrian-schoolcraft/
11. NNDB // http://www.nndb.com/people/542/000369432