Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

International Law and International Organizations
Reference:

Shugurov, M .V. The International Health Organization fi ghting against the pharmaceutical counterfeit: correlation of protection of health care an intellectual property protection

Abstract: The article is devoted to the study of the activities of the WHO in the sphere of fi ghting pharmaceutical counterfeit in the aspect of development of the term “counterfeit” by this organization. The author consequently follows the work of the WHO on clarifi cation of its competence in the sphere of guaranteeing access to quality and effi cient medications, showing that protection of intellectual property rights is a related issue, while being outside the scope of its activities. The article substantiates the position that clear formulae of the term “pharmaceutical counterfeit” are necessary for effi cient international cooperation in the sphere of fi ghting against the wave of counterfeit medications, them being a threat to life and health of the people. Special attention is paid to the correlation between the WHO activities on coordination of international efforts against pharmaceutical counterfeit, and defi ning “counterfeit” as a “ fake” without connotation to the “violation of intellectual property rights”. In this article the author bases his studies upon the comparative analysis of the approaches to defi ning pharmaceutical counterfeit in national and international law. In addition, for the comparative purposes the author uses the approaches towards correlation between protection of health of the population and intellectual property protection in the WHO and the WIPO. It allows for the substantiation of the existence of two international cooperation strategies regarding fi ghting fake pharmaceutical products. The scientifi c novelty of the article is due to revealing the nature of correlation between human rights in the sphere of healthcare and intellectual property rights based upon the example of the activities of the WHO, it being an authoritative international organization. The author makes a conclusion that none of specialized international organization is capable of simultaneously fi ghting falsifi cation of pharmaceutical products in the aspect of protection of right to access to quality and effi cient medication and in the intellectual property protection aspect. However, different international organizations in this sphere should take these aspects into consideration. As the basis for the specifi c features to the WHO approach, the author points out the fact that protection of human rights has higher priority than intellectual property protection, since intellectual property rights are not basic human rights.


Keywords:

access to medication, medical counterfeit, intellectual property, human rights, international cooperation, globalization, patent, trademark, public healthcare, the World Health Organization.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. O. V. Zhurkina, I. M. Cherevchina, Yu. L. Belyaeva. Pravovoe osnovanie klassifikatsii meditsinskikh otkhodov // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – ¹ 3. – S. 104-107.
2. Polubinskaya S.V.. Meditsinskoe pravo v sovremennom gosudarstve // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – ¹ 7. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.7.8981
3. N. M. Dobrynin, A. N. Mitin. Komu vygodno (sui prodest) nakhozhdenie Rossii v VTO? // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – ¹ 9. – S. 104-107.
4. A. R. Shayakhmetova. Obyazannosti storon dogovora vozmezdnogo okazaniya meditsinskikh uslug. // Pravo i politika. – 2011. – ¹ 2.
5. A.A. Rerikht. Aktual'nye problemy meditsinskoi etiki // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2010. – ¹
6. – S. 104-107. 8. O. L. Dubovik, A.A. Rerikht. Transplantatsiya organov, tkanei i kletok v pravovom i kriminologicheskom aspektakh // Pravo i politika. – 2011. – ¹ 12. – S. 104-107.
7. Ushkalova E.A. Problemy fal'sifikatsii lekarstvennykh sredstv: fokus na antimikrobnye preparaty // Klinicheskaya mikrobiologiya i anti-mikrobnaya khimioterapiya. 2005. T.
8. Terekhov A.Yu. Mezhdunarodno-pravovye sredstva predotvrashcheniya oborota fal'sifitsirovannykh lekarstvennykh preparatov. Avtoref. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2011. 23 s.
9. Terekhov A.Yu. Aktual'nye voprosy mezhdunarodno-pravovogo regu-lirovaniya predotvrashcheniya oborota fal'sifitsirovannykh lekarstvennykh sredstv v ramkakh mezhpravitel'stvennykh organizatsii // Evraziiskii yuri-dicheskii zhurnal. 2011. ¹ 4. S. 24 – 29.
10. Sovet Evropy. Konventsiya Medikrim. Protivodeistvie fal'sifika-tsii izdelii meditsinskogo naznacheniya i skhodnym prestupleniyam. Stras-burg: Evropeiskii direktorat po kachestvu lekarstvennykh sredstv, 2011. 15 s.
11. Ostrovskii A.N., Novokreshchenov I.V., Novokreshchenova I.G., Arano-vich L.M., Morozov V.P. Konventsiya «Medikrim»: protivodeistvie fal'si-fikatsii meditsinskoi produktsii v oblasti ugolovnogo prava // Vestnik Ros-zdravnadzora. 2011. ¹ 6. S. 4 – 8.
12. Ivanov N.V. Ponyatie, priznaki i struktura kontrafakta // Intel-lektual'naya sobstvennost'. Kontrafakt. Aktual'nye problemy teorii i praktiki: sb. nauch. trudov. T.2 / Pod red. prof., doktora yurid. nauk V.N. Lopatina. M.: Izdatel'stvo Yurait, 2009. S. 15 – 48.
13. K.I. Korobko. Ponyatie, priznaki, elementy dogovora na okazanie meditsinskikh uslug, zaklyuchaemogo sub''ektami chastnoi meditsinskoi praktiki // Pravo i politika. – 2010. – ¹ 9.
14. Mal'tsev A.E., Mel'nikov O.V. Standarty v sisteme zdravookhraneniya i sudebnoi meditsine // NB: Rossiiskoe politseiskoe pravo. — 2014.-¹ 1.-S.135-142. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4218.2014.1.9910. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/pm/article_9910.html
15. M.I. Litovkina. Rol' sotsial'nogo gosudarstva v obespechenii lekarstvennoi bezopasnosti pri realizatsii konstitutsionnogo prava na okhranu zdorov'ya // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – ¹ 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.01.5
16. L. E. Poteryaiko. Rynok donorskoi krovi i ee komponentov kak neobkhodimost' sovershenstvovaniya sistemy meditsinskogo obespecheniya naseleniya // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2012. – ¹ 8. – S. 104-107.
17. Zholobova G.A.. Problemy pravovogo obespecheniya chastnogo i obshchestvennogo interesov v sfere kommercheskoi farmatsevticheskoi deyatel'nosti v Rossii 1881–1912 gg. // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2013. – ¹ 10. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.10.7706
18. E.L. Panova. Medikalizatsiya zdorov'ya: illyuziya, sposobnaya razrushit' cheloveka // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2012. – ¹ 8. – S. 104-107.
19. B.I. Almazova. Sovremennye tendentsii pravovogo regulirovaniya meditsinskoi deyatel'nosti // Pravo i politika. – 2010. – ¹ 1.
20. O.L. Dubovik, A.A. Rerikht. Chelovek i meditsina: pravovye, filosofskie i eticheskie aspekty // Pravo i politika. – 2009. – ¹ 11.
21. I. I. Nagornaya. Predmetnaya kharakteristika meditsinskoi deyatel'nosti kak osnova ee ugolovno-pravovoi okhrany (opyt Rossii, SShA, Frantsii) // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – ¹ 5. – S. 104-107. 7. ¹ 2. S. 167 – 173. 7. Bate R. Fake: The Deadly World of Falsified and Substandard Medi-cines. Washington: AEI Press, 2012. 400 rp.
22. Chika A., Bello S.O., Jimoch A.O., Umar M.T. The Menace of Fake Drugs: Consequences, Causes and possible Solutions // Research Journal of Med-ical Sciences. 2011. Vol. 5. Issue 5. P. 258 – 261.
23. Counterfeit Medicines and Organized Crime. Turin: United Nations In-terregional Crime and Justice Research Institute, 2012.119 pp.
24. Davison M. Pharmaceutical Anti-Counterfeiting Combating the Real Danger from Fake Drugs. New Jersey: Wiley, 2011. 426 rp.
25. Wertheimer A., Wang P. (eds.) Counterfeit medicines. Vol. I. Policy, Economics and Countermeasures. Glendale: ILM Publications, 2012. 154 pp.
26. S. Yu. Koblov Pravovaya okhrana izobretenii v sootvetstvii s Soglasheniem po torgovym aspektam prav na intellektual'nuyu sobstvennost' (TRIPS). // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations.-2011.-4.-C. 137-141.
27. O. V. Markova Perspektivy pravovoi zashchity
28. intellektual'noi sobstvennosti i sposoby
29. ukrepleniya ustoichivogo elementa sistemy
30. pravovoi zashchity intellektual'noi
31. sobstvennosti // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2012. - 6. - C. 101 - 106.