Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law
Reference:

Avkhadeev V.R. Russian-Norwegian Agreements about Delimitation of Maritime Areas in the Arctic: Modern Problems of Realization and Development Prospects

Abstract: In this article actual problems of implementation of the Russian-Norwegian agreements concerning differentiation of territorial jurisdiction in the Arctic region are considered. The analysis is carried out on basic provisions of the Spitsbergen treaty 1920, Agreements of the USSR and Norway on the mutual relations in the field of fishery of 1976, the Agreement between the Government of the Russian Federation, the Government of the Republic of Iceland and the Government of the Kingdom of Norway concerning some aspects of cooperation in the field of fishery, of May 15, 1999 and the Treaty between the Russian Federation and the Kingdom of Norway on the Maritime Delimitation and Cooperation in the Barents Sea and the Arctic Ocean (with «Fishery questions», «Cross-border fields of hydrocarbons») 2010, and also — according to the conclusions of committees of the State Duma of Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation on the issue of ratification of the Treaty of 2010. The author draws a conclusion about need to revise the Treaty between the Russian Federation and the Kingdom of Norway on the Maritime Delimitation and Cooperation in the Barents Sea and the Arctic Ocean of September 15, 2010 and to give it according to earlier concluded international agreements, and also — taking into account interests of Russia is drawn.


Keywords:

Russian-Norwegian agreements, Legal Regime of Maritime Areas, delimitation, Arctic, Spitsbergen.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Brounli Ya. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. Kniga pervaya / pod red. G.I. Tunkina. M.: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1977. S. 160 / Tsit. po: Vylegzhanin A.N. Shpitsbergen: pravovoy rezhim prilegayushchikh morskikh rayonov / A.N. Vyleg-zhanin, V.K. Zilanov // Teoriya i praktika morskoy deyatel'nosti. 2006. ¹ 10. M.: SOPS, 2006. S. 49.
2. Vylegzhanin A.N. Voprosy tolkovaniya i ispolneniya Dogovora o Shpitsbergene 1920 g. / A.N. Vylegzhanin // Moskovskiy zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava. 2010. ¹ 1 (77). S. 17-18.
3. Vylegzhanin A.N. Shpitsbergen: pravovoy rezhim prilegayushchikh morskikh rayonov / A.N. Vylegzhanin, V.K. Zi-lanov // Teoriya i praktika morskoy deyatel'nosti. 2006. ¹ 10. M.: SOPS, 2006. S. 49-50.
4. Vypolnenie mezhdunarodnykh dogovorov Rossiyskoy Federatsii: monografiya / O.I. Tiunov, A.A. Kashirkina, A.N. Morozov. M.: Norma, 2011. S. 99.
5. Evstigneeva A.M. Osobennosti sovremennogo razvitiya rossiysko-norvezhskikh otnosheniy: avtoref. dis. ... kand. polit. nauk / A. M. Evstigneeva. M.: 2008. S. 3-4.
6. Mel'nik S.O. Odnostoronnie akty gosudarstv / S.O. Mel'nik // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i natsional'noe zakonoda-tel'stvo / Ins-t zakonodatel'stva i sravnit. pravovedeniya pri Pravitel'stve RF. M.: Eksmo, 2009. S. 290.
7. Poval L.M. Rossiysko-norvezhskie soglasheniya o razdele arkticheskikh prostranstv / L.M. Poval // Arktika i Sever. 2012. ¹. 6. S. 18.
8. Sbornik deystvuyushchikh dogovorov, soglasheniy i konventsiy, zaklyuchennykh SSSR s inostrannymi gosudar-stvami. Vyp. IX. M., 1938. S. 53-61 // Tsit. po: Tarasov A.G. Pravovye i politicheskie aspekty razgranicheniya morskoy territorii v Zapadnoy Arktike / A.G. Tarasov. M., 2007. S. 16-17.
9. Smirnov A.I. Murmanskiy koridor: rossiysko-norvezhskoe sotrudnichestvo v Barentsevom regione. Murmansk: Sever, 1998. S. 5.
10. Tarasov A.G. Pravovye i politicheskie aspekty razgranicheniya morskoy territorii v Zapadnoy Arktike / A.G. Tarasov. M., 2007. S. 16-17.
11. Chernosvitov P.Yu. K voprosu o razlichnykh vidakh kolonizatsii territoriy / P.Yu. Chernosvitov // Ocherki isto-rii osvoeniya Shpitsbergena. M., 1990. C. 203-204