Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

International relations
Reference:

China’s Interests in the Balkans

Shaheti Ayibota

PhD in History

Postgraduate Student, Department of Theory and History of International Relations, Russian People’s Friendship University

117198, Russia, Moscow, Miklukho-Maklaya str., 6

1042218009@pfur.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0641.2023.2.40811

EDN:

SAMMBM

Received:

22-05-2023


Published:

29-05-2023


Abstract: The study focuses on the interests of the People’s Republic of China in the Balkans. The study focuses on the political and economic relations of the People’s Republic of China with key players in the Balkans: Serbia, Romania, Bulgaria and the Republic of Turkey. The author examines in detail the national interests of the People’s Republic of China vis-à-vis the States of the region. Close attention is paid to the tension in the region and ways of its alleviation by the People’s Republic of China. This study is based on the theory of political realism characterizing relations between States as rivalry or enmity for the purpose of defending their national interests. The absence of confrontation between States is seen as a temporary phenomenon replaced by confrontation and/or military action. During the study the author applied institutional, analytical and problem-chronological methods. The main conclusions of the research are the establishment of the interests of the People’s Republic of China in the Balkan region in the context of the implementation by the People’s Republic of China of the project «One Belt and One Road», the land part of which is called «The Economic Belt of the New Silk Road», affects key players in the Balkan Peninsula: the Turkish Republic, Romania and Bulgaria. The author found an exception to the policy of economic expansion of the People’s Republic of China in the person of the Republic of Srpska. Moreover, the growth of trade between the People’s Republic of China and Serbia, Turkey, Romania and Bulgaria has been given close attention. The urgency of the study is due to the growing political and economic influence of the People’s Republic of China throughout the world, not excluding the Balkan region.


Keywords:

China, Balkans, Serbia, Kosovo, Turkey, Romania, Bulgaria, OBOR, Interests, Silk Road

This article is automatically translated. You can find original text of the article here.

IntroductionThe influence of the People's Republic of China around the world is growing at a previously unprecedented pace: China's GDP growth is not comparable to the growth of the "Big Seven" countries [1], the political influence of China and the BRICS, in particular, overshadows the successes of the countries of the old and new world [2].

The Balkan region has not become an exception from the list of priority goals of the People's Republic of China.

By itself, the space of the Balkan peninsula has a rather advantageous geographical position: the territory is washed by 5 seas (Adriatic and Ionian from the West, Aegean and Marmara from the Southeast, Black from the East), the region is saturated with minerals. The states located on this territory usually include Albania, Bulgaria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Greece, Romania, Northern Macedonia, Serbia, Slovenia, Turkey, Croatia and Montenegro [3].

However, despite such a favorable geographical location and the general benefits of the region, the peninsula is quite conflictual and unstable. Such a political, social and economic situation is caused by a number of factors: the multi-ethnic composition of the region, the repeated transition of the states of the region from one empire to another, interethnic hostility, unresolved territorial disputes after the collapse of Yugoslavia, and much more. Therefore, the well–established name of the Balkan peninsula - "the powder keg of Europe" has not lost its relevance [4].

Based on the growing economic and political influence of the People's Republic of China, the gradual restructuring of the world, moving away from monopolarity, the conflict of the Balkan Peninsula region, it is necessary to analyze China's political and economic relations with key players in the region, to identify the Chinese strategy in relation to this region, to identify objective factors influencing it, to identify China's interests in the Balkans. This study is based on the theory of political realism, which characterizes relations between states as rivalry or enmity in order to protect their national interests. The absence of confrontation between States is considered as a temporary phenomenon, replaced by confrontation and/or military actions. During the research, the author applied institutional, analytical and problem-chronological methods.

China's relations with the Republic of SerbiaBilateral relations between the PRC and the Republic of Serbia (Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia) were established on January 2, 1955.

Throughout the collapse of Yugoslavia, China supported the Serbian side, condemning the activities of Albanian separatists and the secession of Kosovo. The anti-American position of the PRC towards the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia only intensified after the treacherous bombing attack on the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade. As a result of the airstrike on the Chinese mission, at least 3 people were killed and injured.

Moreover, the Chinese side does not recognize the sovereignty of Kosovo due to the existence of a problem similar to the Serbian one: claims to territorial integrity by Western states in the form of fr. Taiwan. Serbia also recognizes Taiwan as part of China, and accordingly supports the "one China" policy.

Relations between the PRC and Serbia have a number of objective reasons: political solidarity regarding the multipolarity of the world order, common victims during the NATO aggression against Yugoslavia, Serbia's non-alignment, Serbia's economic development favorable for financial investments after the upheavals of the 1990s [5]

 In addition, the total trade turnover between the two countries is more than 4.2 billion US dollars. Of course, the advantage is on the side of the Celestial Empire, which exported goods worth 3.17 billion US dollars to Serbia in 2021, while Serbia – 1.03 billion US dollars [6].

China's relations with RomaniaBilateral relations between the two states are rooted in Romania's socialist past: in 1949.

The stability of relations depended primarily on the relationship between the USSR and the PRC, a particular deterioration occurred after the death of I.V. Stalin and the coming to power of N.S. Khrushchev in the USSR.

After the collapse of the Soviet Union and the entire socialist bloc in Europe, Romania, which was transitioning to a capitalist economy, needed a reliable trading partner in order to keep the economy "afloat". At the time of 1990, Romania's GDP was 39 billion US dollars, by 2000 this figure had fallen to 37.25 billion US dollars, but in 2008 it amounted to 214 billion US dollars [7]. Therefore, Romania is one of the strongest economies on the Balkan peninsula.

An important place in Romania's foreign trade is played by the People's Republic of China, which exports goods and services worth more than 6.8 billion US dollars, while Romania supplies goods and services worth 1.57 billion US dollars to China [8].

It is important to understand that Romania has been a member of the NATO North Atlantic Alliance since 2004 and the European Union since 2007, but such a political commitment to Romania does not affect the PRC's relations with the latter due to the competent policy of economic expansion of the Celestial Empire.

China's relations with BulgariaThe construction of bilateral relations between China and the Republic of Bulgaria followed a similar scenario to the Romanian one: the establishment of relations in 1949, the deterioration of relations with the PRC due to the decline of the Soviet-Chinese, the collapse of the Soviet Union and the socialist bloc, a protracted crisis and the search for a reliable trading partner outside the Balkan region.

The trade turnover between China and Bulgaria in 2021 reached 4 billion US dollars, of which China exports 2.56 billion to Bulgaria, and Bulgaria exports 1.49 billion US dollars to China [9].

As in the case of Romania, China does not attach much importance to Bulgaria's accession to NATO in 2004 and to the EU in 2007.

 China's relations with the Republic of TurkeyBilateral relations between the PRC and the Republic of Turkey were established after the latter recognized the People's Republic of China as the sole legitimate representative of China.

Political relations between two States cannot be described as stable, primarily the fault of the Turkish side: until the mid-2010s, the tension remained in view of the position of the Turkish government against the Uighur issue: in 2009, the Prime Minister of Turkey Recep Tayyip Erdogan described the policy of China in the Xinjiang Uyghur AO as genocide, however, against the background of deteriorating relations with the West, Turkey has changed the rhetoric, and began to follow the policy of "one China" that has changed drastically in 2019, when Turkey launched a condemnation of China because of a policy of assimilation of Uyghurs [10]. This leads to a pattern stating that Turkey's relations with China depend on the Turks' relations with Western countries.

Economic cooperation between China and Turkey does not suffer from a sharp change in Erdogan's political course. The total trade turnover of the two states is more than 35.4 billion US dollars in 2021. The trade imbalance is on the side of the PRC, which supplies more than 31 billion dollars worth of goods and services to Turkey, while Turkey supplies 3.79 billion US dollars [11].

It is important to note that neither Turkey's membership in NATO, nor the republic's policy on the territory of Syria, nor Erdogan's abrupt changes in course have any effect on economic cooperation between the two states, China's economic weight literally forces Turkey to trade, especially given the favorable geographical location of the latter. Turkey is a gateway to Europe, which is one of the main destinations of Chinese trade routes.

The Balkan Peninsula in the context of the One Belt and One Road projectThe People's Republic of China, aimed at expanding its economic influence, in 2013 presented the "One Belt and One Road" project, which should connect the West and the East by trade routes, literally become the revival of the Silk Road.

This project consists of two corridors: the land (the Economic Belt of the New Silk Road) and the sea (the Maritime Silk Road of the 21st Century) [12].

The land corridor passing through a huge number of countries in Asia, the Middle East and Europe will become a key trade, financial, tourist and investment route, will pass through the Balkan region: Turkey, Bulgaria and Romania.

Of course, China is focused on the implementation of this grandiose project, because it will allow to conquer a huge number of markets, especially the European one, without hindrance. Therefore, the preservation of favorable relations with the countries of the Balkan peninsula also remains a priority [13].

ConclusionThe growing political and economic influence of China does not remain closed in the Asian region, the Celestial Empire is looking for new routes for the sale of its goods, therefore the "One Belt and One Road" project and, especially, its land part play an important role in the implementation of the previously mentioned plans [14].

The Chinese side considers the Balkan region purely from the point of view of economic benefits that meet the interests of the Celestial Empire, but the PRC also finds a political partnership in the region in the person of Serbia. Leveling the high conflict potential of the region, the Chinese side does not take part in confrontations, but establishes economic ties to build a "bridge" to Europe.  

References
1. GDP (current US$) – China. URL: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD?locations=CN (accessed: 20.05.2023)
2. Razumnova, L.L., & Migaleva, T.E. (2019). The rise of China’s political and economic influence in the modern world: pluralism of opinions. International trade and trade policy, 4(20), 42-64.
3. Balkan Peninsula. URL: https://old.bigenc.ru/geography/text/5661870 (accessed: 20.05.2023)
4. Balkans remains a region with untapped conflict potential. URL: https://mgimo.ru/about/news/experts/balkany-ostayutsya-regionom/ (accessed: 20.05.2023)
5. China sees Serbia as a gateway to Europe. URL: https://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/columns/balkanpolicy/kitay-uvidel-v-serbii-vorota-v-evropu/ (accessed: 20.05.2023)
6. Serbia – China. URL: https://oec.world/en/profile/bilateral-country/srb/partner/chn?redirect=true (accessed: 20.05.2023)
7. GDP (current US$) – Romania. URL: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD?locations=RO (accessed: 20.05.2023)
8. Romania – China. URL: https://oec.world/en/profile/bilateral-country/rou/partner/chn  (accessed: 20.05.2023)
9. Bulgaria – China. URL: https://oec.world/en/profile/bilateral-country/bgr/partner/chn  (accessed: 20.05.2023)
10. Vinogradov, A.O., & Muminova, S.A. (2021). Sino-Turkish relations: modern stage. China in world and regional politics. History and modernity, 26(26), 200-226. doi:10.24412/2618-6888-2021-26-200-226
11. Turkey – China. URL: https://oec.world/en/profile/bilateral-country/tur/partner/chn (accessed: 20.05.2023)
12. Scherba, K.D. (2019). “One belt and one road”: the perspectives of conjugation with the EAEU. Social and humanitarian knowledge, 6, 312 – 316.
13. The Belt & Road Initiative. URL: https://www.newsilkroadnetwork.com/en/belt-and-road (accessed: 21.05.2023)
14. Larin, A.G., & Matveev, V.A. (2014). The chinese strategy of "go West" and the new Silk Road. Problems of the Far East, 5, 5 – 15.

Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

Review of the article "China's interests in the Balkans" The subject of the article is indicated in the title and explained in the text of the article. The research methodology is based on the principles of science, objectivism and historicism. The work used institutional, analytical and problem-chronological research methods. The relevance of the topic. The growth of China's influence in the modern world is determined by the growth of its GDP, and with the growth of the economy, China's political influence has also grown. China is increasing its influence in the world and, probably, there is no region in which China does not show interest, China also has interests in the Balkans. The relevance of the topic is beyond doubt. The author writes that China's interest in the Balkans is due to the advantageous "geographical position of the Balkan Peninsula: graphical position: the territory is washed by 5 seas (Adriatic and Ionian from the West, Aegean and Marmara from the Southeast, Black from the East)" and the fact that the region is rich in minerals. The author emphasizes the conflict nature of the region and notes that China is pragmatic and pursues its economic interests. Scientific novelty is determined by the formulation of the problem and objectives of the study. The scientific novelty is also determined by the fact that the author reveals "the Chinese strategy in relation to this region, identifies objective factors influencing China's policy, and also defines China's interests in the Balkans as a whole and in each individual country. The style of the article is academic, the language is clear and precise. The structure of the work and the logic of the presentation of the material are predetermined by the purpose and objectives of the study. The structure consists of the following sections: Introduction; PRC relations with the Republic of Serbia; PRC relations with Romania; PRC relations with Bulgaria; PRC relations with the Republic of Turkey; The Balkan Peninsula in the context of the One Belt and One Road project; Conclusion. In the introduction, the author reveals the subject of the study, the relevance and research methods that he used when working on the topic. The author, as the structure shows, examines the relations of the PRC separately with each of the countries of the region, which makes it possible to study and show the specifics of these relations. Thus, in relations with the Republic of Serbia, China has always opposed Kosovo separatism (and this is due to the Taiwan problem), economic relations have been developing between the two countries since 1955 and trade turnover is high, the advantage is on China's side. The author identifies the specifics of the relationship with each country and writes about them. In the section "The Balkan Peninsula in the context of the "One Belt and One Road" project, the author reveals the essence of the "One Belt and One Road" project, and writes that this project "should connect the West and the East by trade routes, literally become the revival of the Silk Road" and notes that China aims to implement this project" which will help China "conquer a huge number of markets, especially European ones." The conclusions given in the conclusion are objective and follow from the work done. The bibliography of the work includes 14 sources on the research topic, the number of sources and their number is sufficient to prepare an objective work on the topic under study. The appeal to the opponents is presented at the level of the collected information received by the author during the work on the topic of the article and in the bibliography. The article is written on an interesting scientific topic and will arouse the interest of readers of the journal.