Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

NB: Administrative Law and Administration Practice
Reference:

Organization of the Activities of the Internal Affairs Bodies in the Context of the Emergence of New Challenges to Russia's Cybersecurity

Begeza Vitaliy Vasilevich

ORCID: 0000-0002-5201-520X

Senior Lecturer, Department of Public Administration and National Security, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

119602, Russia, Moscow, Vernadsky ave., 84 with 1

89250240000@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2306-9945.2023.2.39962

EDN:

ASFTXL

Received:

12-03-2023


Published:

25-03-2023


Abstract: The article deals with the problem of the organization and effectiveness of law enforcement agencies in ensuring cyber security of the Russian Federation. Based on the analysis of regulatory legal acts and the effectiveness of law enforcement agencies. Cybercrime is gaining more and more popularity every year, and thus more and more importance is attached to it by law enforcement agencies. Statistics of the GIAC of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia on the state of crime in the Russian Federation for January - October 2022 shows that the number of crimes committed using information technology decreased by 5.6%. However, such statistics only confirm that law enforcement agencies are successfully coping with the performance of a preventive function, preventing and suppressing crimes in the field of information technology.   At the same time, statistics do not indicate that cybercrimes are losing their relevance. They are acquiring a new format, becoming more sophisticated in technical terms, which, of course, requires more competence and professionalism from law enforcement agencies in this area. In 2022, a new department is operating in the structure of the internal affairs bodies – the "Department for the Organization of Combating the Illegal Use of Information and Communication Technologies" as a specialized department in the structure of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. The legislator points out as the reasons for the creation of the Department – the growth of computer attacks, remote theft of funds and the active development of the illegal digital industry.


Keywords:

cybercrime, cryptocurrency, crime, fraud, programmer, law enforcement agencies, information technology, Internet, national security, cybersecurity

This article is automatically translated. You can find original text of the article here.

The time we live in is unique primarily because we have the happy opportunity to observe the continuous process of the emergence of new and very different technologies. Every year scientists, programmers and enthusiasts come up with and create revolutionary technical solutions in the digital environment, some of which simplify our lives, others can become a serious problem because they are used for cyber fraud. For example, cyber fraud with cryptocurrency, the creation of phishing sites, the creation of fake exchanges and much more[1].

Cybercrime is becoming more and more popular every year, and thus more and more importance is attached to it by law enforcement agencies. Statistics of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia on the state of crime in the Russian Federation for 2022 shows that, compared with 2021, the proportion of registered cybercrimes increased by only 0.7%, however, the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia reports that every fourth crime is committed using information technology[2]

Statistics confirm the dominant role of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia in ensuring cybersecurity in Russia – the majority of cybercrimes (98.7%) are detected by the internal affairs bodies, and only 1.3% by the investigative bodies of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation and the Federal Security Service. At the same time, the detection rate of crimes committed using IT technologies increased by 4.4% in 2022 compared to 2021, which indicates an increase in the efficiency of disclosure and investigation of criminal acts of this category. 

Statistics of the GIAC of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia on the state of crime in the Russian Federation for January 2023 shows that cybercrime rates increased by 14.2%[3]. Such statistics, showing a negative trend of increasing cybercrime, are associated with the digitalization of public relations, openness and accessibility of information on the Internet, in which it is also easy to remain anonymous.

Back in 2021, the Prosecutor General of Russia Igor Krasnov noted that cybercrime is becoming a real new threat to national security both in Russia and the CIS countries[4]. The head of the Main Organizational and Analytical Department of the Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian Federation Andrey Nekrasov also reported a low detection rate of crimes in the field of information technology, fixed at a level of no more than 25%[5]

In the system of law enforcement agencies, the main role in the fight against cybercrime is occupied by the internal affairs bodies, which is explained, firstly, by the powers established by law. Secondly, their dominant role as the body authorized to ensure the national security of the Russian Federation (hereinafter – the Russian Federation). The dominant role of internal affairs bodies in ensuring national security has been repeatedly emphasized in the literature, for example: Zhaglin A.V.[6], Mazov S.G.[7].

It is worth explaining that cybersecurity and national security are correlated as part and whole, respectively, which follows from the analysis The National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation of 2021[8], which speaks not directly about cybersecurity, but about information security. The Strategy states that ensuring information security is one of the strategic national priorities.

In the doctrine of Russian law, some authors also note that national security is the combined name of various types of security, including information security. Thus, I.B. Kardashova points out that "security is a generic concept for all types of security"[9], and A.A. Prokhozhev considers it necessary to allocate special types of national security that cover the whole set of public relations[10].

Indeed, cybersecurity is a structural element of the national security of the state, while no less important than other types of security. Taking into account the dominant role of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia in ensuring cybersecurity, special attention should be paid to the organization of the activities of this body, which will allow increasing efficiency and efficiency in detecting, suppressing and disclosing cybercrimes.   

Since September 2022, a new department has been operating in the structure of the internal affairs bodies – the Department for Organizing the Fight against the Illegal Use of Information and Communication Technologies (hereinafter referred to as the Department)[11] as a specialized department in the structure of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. The legislator points out as the reasons for the creation of the Department – the growth of computer attacks, remote theft of funds and the active development of the illegal digital industry. 

Thus, the powers to combat crimes in the digital industry, e-commerce, including crimes that infringe on the information security of the Russian Federation, have been transferred to the Management statement. Prevention, detection, suppression and disclosure of crimes and other offenses in the field of information and communication technologies, coordination of these activities in the system of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia are the main tasks of the Department[12]

In December 2022, the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia approved the "Regulations on the Department for the Organization of Combating the Illegal Use of Information and Communication Technologies of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation" (hereinafter referred to as the Regulation), which defined the main tasks, functions, powers of the Department, and also specified the provisions on the organization and maintenance of the Department [13].

The regulation limited the authority of the Department to organize and participate in the detection, prevention, suppression and disclosure of crimes, defining their category – grave and especially grave crimes committed using information technology or in the field of information technology. Thus, the Department takes on the main burden in the fight against cybercrime, since, as the statistics of the GIAC of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia show, more than half of cybercrimes (52.1%) belong to the categories of serious and especially serious [14].

 

Subject to article 15 The Criminal Code of the Russian Federation[15] (hereinafter – the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation) such crimes are the following crimes of Chapter 28 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation: Part 4 of Article 272; Part 3 of Article 272; Part 3-5 of Article 274.1. It is noteworthy that the new corpus delicti that appeared in 2022, provided for in Article 274.2 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (violation of the rules of centralized management of technical means countering threats to the stability, security and integrity of the functioning of the Internet)[16] does not fall within the scope of the authority of the Department, since it belongs to the category of crimes of minor gravity. 

In addition, the Department is authorized to investigate such elements of crimes in which life, health, sexual integrity, private life, secret correspondence, property, copyrights and others are the direct object of encroachment. Such crimes must be either connected with the use and dissemination of prohibited information on the Internet, or with illegal access to computer information and (or) the use of malicious software. 

So, in fact, the authority of the Department includes the investigation of any crimes provided for by the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, which are directly or indirectly related to ensuring cybersecurity of the Russian Federation. The above suggests that the Department as a structural unit in the system of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia plays a key role in ensuring the cybersecurity of the Russian Federation, which indicates the need to organize the effective functioning of the Department. 

It is worth noting that despite the apparent legal certainty of the Management's activities and the appearance of the Provision, still some issues have not been disclosed by the legislator and still remain unresolved. In particular, the issues of organizing the interaction of the Department with other public authorities that also specialize in ensuring cybersecurity. 

It is assumed that the Department will be forced to interact, in particular, with the Ministry of Digital Development, Communications and Mass Communications of the Russian Federation (hereinafter – the Ministry) and the body subordinate to the Ministry – the Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technology and Mass Communications (hereinafter – Roskomnadzor). 

At the same time, the Provision was limited only to indicating the authority of the Department for interaction with state authorities of the subjects of the Russian Federation, other state and municipal bodies. However, taking into account the specifics of the Department's field of activity, it seems necessary to specify the issues of its communication at least with Roskomnadzor, which carries out state control and supervision in the field of information technology.

Roskomnadzor carries out its activities in the field of protecting children from information that harms their health and (or) development, and also restricts access to information on the Internet. The scope of Roskomnadzor's activities intersects with the activities of the Department, which is authorized to investigate crimes related to copyright and related rights violations committed in conjunction with unlawful access to computer information and (or) the use of malicious software [17].

If information is found, the dissemination of which is prohibited on the territory of the Russian Federation, the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia may, out of court, apply to Roskomnadzor with a request to restrict access to the information resource on which such information is posted18[18]. However, the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia may decide to restrict access only to information related to narcotic, psychotropic and other similar substances[19]. The Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia may also apply to Roskomnadzor to restrict access to "web mirrors" of Internet sites containing extremist materials20[20].

At the same time, the legislator did not indicate the possibility of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia to make decisions regarding other illegal content and information, the distribution of which is prohibited on the territory of the Russian Federation. For example, the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, and accordingly the Department, do not have the opportunity to apply to Roskomnadzor for restricting access to information resources that contain information that poses a threat of harm to the life, health and property of citizens. Although the organization of the suppression of the dissemination of such information on the Internet belongs to the Management statement [21].

The solution to this problem is seen in the creation of a regulatory legal act that would regulate the issues of interaction of Management with other public authorities, in particular with Roskomnadzor. Particular importance should be given to the organization of restricting access to information on the Internet, presenting the Department with the authority to make decisions regarding information that poses a threat of harm to the life, health and property of citizens.

Thus, as a result of studying the topic, material was obtained, the analysis of which allowed us to conclude that at the moment the organization of the activities of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia in terms of ensuring cybersecurity is at the proper level. In connection with the creation of the Department, it seems possible to further harmonize legislative and local regulations in the field of cybersecurity of the Russian Federation. 

In addition, as a result of studying the legislation, it was found out that the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia does not have the ability to make decisions on restricting access to illegal information, the distribution and placement on the Internet of which the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia not only monitors, but also investigates crimes. In this regard, it seems necessary to investigate in detail the order of interaction of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, in particular Management, with other public authorities, in particular with Roskomnadzor. 

It seems necessary to allow the Department to independently make decisions regarding the restriction of access to information resources on the Internet, which contain information that poses a threat of harm to the life, health and property of citizens, and which the Department has identified by monitoring information resources for compliance with legislation. 

References
1. Zhaglin A.V. Internal affairs bodies in the national security system of the Russian Federation: monograph / A.V. Zhaglin. – Voronezh: ITOUR Institute, 2008. – 224 p.
2. Informatization and information security of law enforcement agencies: proceedings of the XXVI All–Russian Scientific Conference (Moscow, 07.07.2017). – M: Academy of Management of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2017.-350 p.
3. Kardashova I. B. The Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia in the system of ensuring national security of the Russian Federation: monograph / I. B. Kardashova. M.: Research Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2006. – 209 p.
4. Prokhozhev A. A. Theoretical and methodological foundations of Russia's security / A. A. Prokhozhev // Russia's security in the XXI century. – Moscow: RIC ISPI RAS, 2006. – pp. 129-140.
5. Mazov S.G. The role of internal affairs bodies in ensuring national security //Proceedings of the Academy of Management of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2012. No.2 (22). pp. 120-122.
6. "Criminal Code of the Russian Federation" dated 13.06.1996 No. 63-FZ// Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation, 1996, No. 25, Article 2954.
7. Federal Law No. 149-FZ of July 27, 2006 "On Information, Information Technologies and Information Protection"//Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation, 31.07.2006, No. 31 (Part I), Article 3448.
8. Federal Law No. 260-FZ of 14.07.2022 "On Amendments to the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation"// Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation, 18.07.2022, No. 29 (Part II), Article 5227.
9. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 1101 dated October 26, 2012 "On the Unified Automated Information System "Unified Register of Domain Names, Site Page Indexes in the Internet Information and Telecommunications Network and Network Addresses that allow Identifying sites in the Internet information and Telecommunications Network containing information distributed in the Russian FederationAI is prohibited"// Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation, 29.10.2012, No. 44, Article 6044.
10. Order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation No. 1110 dated 12/29/2022 "On Approval of the Regulations on the Department for the Organization of Combating the Illegal Use of Information and Communication Technologies of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation"
11. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 688 dated 30.09.2022 "On Amendments to Certain Acts of the President of the Russian Federation"//Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation, 03.10.2022, No. 40, Article 6787.
12. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated 02.07.2021 No. 400 "On the National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation"//Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation, 2021, No. 27 (Part II). Article 5351.
13. In the structure of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, a Department has been created to organize the fight against the illegal use of information and communication technologies [Electronic resource] URL: https://ìâä.ðô/news/item/32844180 / (date of request: 10.11.2022)
14. Conference of heads of Prosecutor's offices of European states on the topic "The role of the Prosecutor's Office in the protection of individual rights and public interest in the light of the requirements of the European Convention on Human Rights" (St. Petersburg, July 6-9, 2021) [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://epp.genproc.gov.ru/web/gprf/activity/international-cooperation/rus (date of appeal: 12/19/2022).
15. The Prosecutor General's Office stated that cybercrime has become a threat to national security [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://tass.ru/obschestvo/11451173 (accessed: 12/19/2022).
16. Cyber fraud in Russia: facts, trends and analysis [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://crypto.ru/kibermoshennichestvo-v-rossii / (accessed: 12/19/2022).
17. Statistics of the GIAC of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia on the state of crime in the Russian Federation for January-October 2022 [Electronic resource] URL: https://ìâä.ðô/reports/item/33913311 / (accessed: 11/20/2022)

First Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The subject of the study. The article "Organization of the activities of internal affairs bodies in the context of the emergence of new challenges to cybersecurity in Russia" as a subject of research has the organizational and legal basis for the activities of special units of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia in the field of cybercrime. Research methodology. We believe that the author used exclusively the method of describing the organizational and legal foundations of the activities of special units of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia (rather one structural unit - the "Department for the Organization of combating the Illegal use of information and Communication technologies") in the field of cybercrime. Some attempts have been made to conduct an analysis, but in the end, the author limited himself to reviewing different points of view on the subject of the study. It seems that the methodological apparatus has not been developed in this work. The relevance of research. In the context of global digitalization and the formation of the information society, as well as the growing number of cybercrimes, the topic of this work seems very relevant. The scientific novelty of the research. Due to the improvement of the organizational and legal foundations of the activities of the internal affairs bodies of the Russian Federation in the context of the emergence of new cybersecurity challenges, the topic chosen for research has not been sufficiently developed in Russian legal science and is characterized by scientific novelty. Style, structure, and content. The work is descriptive in nature. The author makes terminological errors (for example, the author uses "normative legal act" instead of "normative legal act" or "new composition of the article..." instead of "a new corpus delicti provided for in Article ...", etc.). The author writes that: "Since September 2022, a new department has been operating in the structure of the internal affairs bodies – the Department for Organizing the Fight against the Illegal Use of Information and Communication Technologies (hereinafter referred to as the Department)," and in the final part concludes that: "In addition, as a result of studying the legislation, it was found out that the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia and the Department, respectively, do not have the opportunity ...", "In this regard, it seems necessary to study in detail the procedure for interaction between the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia and the Department ..." Such conclusions seem illogical, since the Department is part of the structure of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. The author has made an attempt to structure his work, although it is not formally divided into parts. We believe that the content of the work is narrower than the topic stated by the author. Therefore, it cannot be said that the topic has been disclosed. The statistical data provided by the author on the reduction in the number of crimes committed using information technology by 5.6% (as of October 2022) are questionable. There are already published statistics for 2022. So, with reference to the official website of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, it can be noted: "Cybercrime rates have increased by 14.2%. There are 85.1% more recorded facts of drug sales using information and telecommunication technologies. There are continuing trends of an increase in the number of IT scams by 12%. At the same time, the number of IT thefts decreased by 13.1%, as well as crimes related to the use of computer equipment - by 10.3% and settlement plastic cards – by 7.7%" (https://ìâä.ðô/reports/item/35396677 /). Bibliography. The author has studied unacceptably little by the source on the stated topic, there are no references to publications of recent years in the bibliography list (the latest publication in the list is 2017). During the writing of the work, the author did not address the opinions of such authoritative scientists as S.V. Ovchinsky, A.A. Smirnov, T.A. Polyakova, etc., who deal with information security issues, including the problems of countering cybercrime and improving the system of law enforcement agencies ensuring cybersecurity. Appeal to opponents. The article contains an overview of several opinions (or rather two) on the issue of the relationship between the concepts of "information security" and "cybersecurity". The author's position on this issue is unclear. Conclusions, the interest of the readership. Despite the relevance of the topic, the article "Organization of the activities of internal affairs bodies in the context of the emergence of new challenges to Russian cybersecurity" cannot be recommended for publication, because it does not meet the requirements for scientific papers.

Second Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

A REVIEW of an article on the topic "Organization of the activities of internal affairs bodies in the context of the emergence of new challenges to cybersecurity in Russia." The subject of the study. The article proposed for review is devoted to the organization of "... the activities of internal affairs bodies in the context of the emergence of new challenges to Russia's cybersecurity." The author has chosen a special subject of research: the proposed issues are investigated from the point of view of constitutional, administrative and information law, while the author notes that "... scientists, programmers and enthusiasts come up with and create revolutionary technical solutions in the digital environment, some of which simplify our lives, others can become a serious problem because they are used for cyberbullying". NPAs relevant to the purpose of the study are being studied. A certain, not very large (4 titles) volume of Russian scientific literature on the stated issues is also studied and summarized, analysis and discussion with these opposing authors are present. More modern literature is available on the Internet and the ATP. But the author dwelled on the period 2006-2017. At the same time, the author notes: "Cybercrime is becoming more and more popular every year and thus it is becoming more and more important on the part of law enforcement agencies." Research methodology. The purpose of the study is determined by the title and content of the work: "... the main role in the fight against cybercrime is occupied by the internal affairs bodies, which is explained, firstly, by the powers established by law. Secondly, their dominant role as the body authorized to ensure the national security of the Russian Federation ...", "... statistics showing a negative trend of increasing cybercrime is associated with the digitalization of public relations, openness and accessibility of information on the Internet, in which it is also easy to remain anonymous." They can be designated as the consideration and resolution of certain problematic aspects related to the above-mentioned issues and the use of certain experience. Based on the set goals and objectives, the author has chosen a certain methodological basis for the study. The author uses a set of private scientific, special legal methods of cognition. In particular, the methods of analysis and synthesis made it possible to generalize some approaches to the proposed topic and influenced the author's conclusions. The most important role was played by special legal methods. In particular, the author used formal legal and comparative legal methods, which made it possible to analyze and interpret the norms of acts of Russian legislation and compare various documents. In particular, the following conclusions are drawn: "Taking into account the dominant role of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia in ensuring cybersecurity, special attention should be paid to the organization of the activities of the named body, which will increase efficiency and efficiency in detecting, suppressing and disclosing cybercrimes," etc. Thus, the methodology chosen by the author is fully adequate to the purpose of the article, allows you to study many aspects of the topic. The relevance of the stated issues is beyond doubt. This topic is important in Russia, from a legal point of view, the work proposed by the author can be considered relevant, namely, he notes "... with the apparent legal certainty of the Management's activities and the appearance of the Situation, nevertheless some issues have not been disclosed by the legislator and still remain unresolved. In particular, the issues of organizing the interaction of the Department with other public authorities, which also specialize in ensuring cybersecurity." And in fact, an analysis of the opponents' work should follow here, and it follows, but in limited quantities, and the author shows a certain ability to master the material. Thus, scientific research in the proposed field is only to be welcomed. Scientific novelty. The scientific novelty of the proposed article is beyond doubt. It is expressed in the specific scientific conclusions of the author. Among them, for example, is the following: "It seems necessary to allow the Department to independently make decisions regarding restricting access to information resources on the Internet, which contain information that poses a threat of harm to the life, health and property of citizens, and which the Department has identified through monitoring information resources for compliance with legislation." As can be seen, these and other "theoretical" conclusions can be used to a certain extent in further research. Thus, the materials of the article as presented may be of some interest to the scientific community. Style, structure, content. The subject of the article corresponds to the specialization of the journal "Administrative Law and Practice of Administration", as it is devoted to the organization of "... the activities of internal affairs bodies in the context of the emergence of new challenges to cybersecurity in Russia." The article contains an analysis of the opponents' scientific works, so the author notes that a question close to this topic has already been raised and the author uses their materials, discusses with opponents. The content of the article corresponds to the title, since the author considered the stated problems and achieved the goal of his research. The quality of the presentation of the study and its results should be recognized as improved. The subject, objectives, methodology, research results, and scientific novelty directly follow from the text of the article. The design of the work meets the requirements for this kind of work. No significant violations of these requirements were found, except for the lack of modern literature and a typo "refers to the management statement" (probably "management"?). The bibliography is not very complete, it contains publications in the period 2006-2017, NPAs, to which the author refers. This allows the author to correctly identify problems and put them up for discussion. The quality of the literature presented and used should not be appreciated very highly. The presence of modern scientific literature would show greater validity of the author's conclusions and would influence the author's conclusions. The works of these authors correspond to the research topic, have a certain sign of sufficiency, and contribute to the disclosure of some aspects of the topic. Appeal to opponents. The author conducted an analysis of the current state of the problem under study based on materials mainly from scientific research. The author describes some of the opponents' points of view on the problem, argues for a more correct position in his opinion, relying in some cases on the work of opponents, and offers solutions to problems. Conclusions, the interest of the readership. The conclusions are logical, specific "... as a result of studying the legislation, it was found out that the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia does not have the ability to make decisions on restricting access to illegal information, the distribution and placement on the Internet of which the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia not only monitors, but also investigates crimes", etc. The article in this form may be of interest to the readership in terms of the systematic positions of the author in relation to the issues stated in the article. Based on the above, summing up all the positive and negative sides of the article, I recommend publishing it, taking into account the comments.