Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law
Reference:

Golovanova N.A. Confiscation vs. Corruption (Foreign Experience)

Abstract: This article is concerned with issues of foreign states successful experience of legislative regulation of assets forfeiture mechanisms resulting from corruption offenses. Confiscation of assets of the perpetrator, if a crime was committed out of mercenary or corruption motives, according to the author, is the fairest society response. The purpose of confiscation proceedings is to deprive the defendant of the financial benefit that he or she has obtained from criminal conduct. Modern states are increasingly using different types of confiscation to deprive criminals of any proceeds derived from corruption-related offenses (all free property wherever situated and includes money; all forms of real or personal property; and things in action and other intangible or incorporated property). In many countries, confiscation in rem is widely applicable. This method allows confiscation of illicit assets, the proceeds of crime, hidden by the third parties (relatives, heirs, partners) out of criminal procedure. Application of civil procedure methods transfers the burden of proof to the defendant. This is one of the main advantages of civil forfeiture compared with traditional criminal confiscation. The article analyzes what changes this institution is currently undergoing. Examples of this are the Australian laws on unexplained wealth. Under the influence of international instruments extended confiscation is increasingly introduced in modern foreign criminal law, which allows to use similar methods with civil proceedings. Having analyzed the forfeiture legislation in relation to the proceeds of corruption of several foreign countries in recent years (Italy, Slovenia, Australia, The Republic of Korea and others), the author concludes that there are significant changes in the traditional approach to this institution. It can be said that the scope of the institution is extending and modified in various jurisdictions. The author believes that foreign experience can be obtained to address Russian issues.


Keywords:

corruption, proceeds of crime, extended confiscation, unexplained wealth, civil recovery, burden of proof, civil procedure methods, new legislative regulation, foreign law, criminal law.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Vozvrat pokhishchennykh aktivov: Rukovodstvo po konfiskatsii aktivov vne ugolovnogo proizvodstva / Teodor Grin-berg, Linda Semyuel', Vingeyt Grant, Larisa Grey; Per. s angl. – M.: Al'pina Pablisherrz, 2010. – 356 s. (rus).
2. Zor'kin V.D. Korruptsiya kak ugroza stabil'nomu razvitiyu obshchestva // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. – 2012. –
3. – C. 18-19. 3. Korruptsiya: priroda, proyavleniya, protivodeystvie. Monografiya / otv. red. akademik RAN T.Ya. Khabrieva. – M.: ID «Yurisprudentsiya», 2012. – 688 s.
4. O sovershenstvovanii pravovogo regulirovaniya vyyavleniya korruptsionnykh pravonarusheniy i vozmeshcheniya pri-chinennogo imi ushcherba. Sbornik materialov. Sovet Federatsii Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii. M., 2011 // http://council.gov.ru/media/files/41d44f2448f9414a68b4.pdf.
5. Perspektivy primeneniya mekhanizmov zamorazhivaniya, aresta i konfiskatsii prestupnykh aktivov, mekhanizmov uprav-leniya konfiskovannymi aktivami / [V.I. Lafitskiy i dr.; otv. red. V.I. Lafitskiy]. – Moskva: Institut zakonodatel'-stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya pri Pravitel'stve Rossiyskoy Federatsii: MUMTsFM, 2014. – 520 s.
6. Pravovye mekhanizmy implementatsii antikorruptsionnykh konventsiy: monografiya / T.Ya Khabrieva, O.I. Tiunov, V.P. Kashepov i dr.; otv. red. O.I. Tiunov. M.: Institut zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya pri Pra-vitel'stve Rossiyskoy Federatsii; ID «Yurisprudentsiya», 2012. – 288 s.
7. Pravovye osnovy protivodeystviya korruptsii: uchebnoe posobie / N.A. Vlasenko, S.A. Gracheva, E.E. Rafalyuk i dr.; otv. red. N.A. Vlasenko. – M. Institut zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya pri Pravitel'stve Ros-siyskoy Federatsii; OOO «POLIGRF-PLYuS», 2013. – 310 s.
8. Pravovye sredstva protivodeystviya korruptsii: nauchno-prakticheskoe posobie / [N.A. Vlasenko, S.A. Gracheva, E.E. Rafalyuk i dr.; otv. red. N.A. Vlasenko]. – M. Institut zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya pri Pravitel'stve Rossiyskoy Federatsii; ID «Yurisprudentsiya», 2012. – 344 s.
9. Semykina O.I. Sovremennye tendentsii razvitiya ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva o prestupleniyakh ekonomicheskoy napravlennosti (sravnitel'no-pravovoe issledovanie) // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'-nogo pravovedeniya. – 2014. – 2. – C. 327-38.
10. Ugolovnoe pravo zarubezhnykh stran. Obshchaya i osobennaya chasti: uchebnik dlya magistrov / pod red. N. E. Krylovoy. – 4-e izd., pererab. i dop. – M.: Izdatel'stvo Yurayt, 2013. – 519 s.
11. Ugolovno-pravovye mery po protivodeystviyu korruptsii za rubezhom: sravnitel'no-pravovoe issledovanie / I.S. Vlasov, N.A. Golovanova, A.A. Men'shikh i dr.; otv. red. I.S. Vlasov. – M.: Institut zakonodatel'stva i sravni-tel'nogo pravovedeniya pri Pravitel'stve Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 2014. – 432 s.
12. Khabrieva T.Ya. Nauchno-pravovye problemy protivodeystviya korruptsii // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. – 2012. – 3. – C. 6-14.
13. ADB/OECD Anti-Corruption Initiative for Asia and the Pacific. The Criminalisation of Bribery in Asia and the Pacific Frameworks and Practices in 28 Asian and Pacific jurisdictions Thematic Review – Final Report // http://www.oecd.org/ site/adboecdanti-corruptioninitiative/46485272.pdf.
14. Australian Parliament. Report of the Australian Parliamentary Delegation to Canada, the United States, Italy, Austria, the United Kingdom & the Netherlands, June 2009, p 62 // http://www.aph.gov.au/~/media/05%20About%20Parliament/ International%20program/Outgoing%20delegations%2042nd%20parliament/australian_crime_commission.pdf.
15. Commission Staff Working Document Montenegro 2012 Progress Report accompanying the document. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2012-2013 {COM(2012) 600 final} //http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2012/package/mn_rapport_2012_ en.pdf.
16. Crimes Legislation Amendment (Unexplained Wealth and Other Measures) Bill 2014. Explanatory Memorandum. // http:// parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fems%2Fr5178_ems_9b86e97ce200-46af-8f14-002c1ea774d0%22.
17. Korean Laws on Recovery and Confiscation of Proceeds of Crime //http://www.shinkim.com/upload_files/newsletter/ SHIN&KIM_CriminalDispute_Legal_Update_201311_en.pdf.;.//http://koreanlii.or.kr/w/index.php/Chun_Doo-hwan_Act.
18. Seminar: Identifying, Restraining and Recovering Stolen Assets in the OSCE Region 3-5 September 2012 Session IV Mr. Alberto Perduca, Deputy Head Prosecutor in Torino, Italy. http://www.osce.org/eea/93412.
19. Sheppard Mullin Richter, Fatema K. Merchant. Beach houses and bribes: DOJ seeks over $700,000 from former South Korean President. (South Korea, USA). May 1 2014 // http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=bbb06c76-e554-4394-9b12-29108fc6f5ef.
20. Tak-Kyun Hong and Myong-Hyon (Brandon) Ryu. Korean laws on recovery and confiscation of proceeds of crime. //http:// www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=f701f49c-49fa-4efc-bb32-4676f6b5672b.
21. US Moves to Seize Proceeds Traced to Former South Korean President.// http://blogs.wsj.com/korearealtime/2014/04/25/ us-moves-to-seize-proceeds-traced-to-former-south-korean-president/