Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

History magazine - researches
Reference:

Kudashkina N.A. The artistic image of Sevastopol during the period of the Crimean war (1853–1856) and its role in the historical development of the city (based on the works of L. N. Tolstoy and M. M. Filippov)

Abstract: The article examines the events relating to the Crimean war (1853–1856) through an analysis of fictional literature from which the artistic image of Sevastopol of that time is reconstituted. On the example of the works of L. N. Tolstoy “Sevastopol sketches” and M. M. Filippov “Besieged Sevastopol” the semantic content, structure, and basic functions of the artistic image are revealed. The key historiographical stances on the question of using literature as a historical source are also addressed. The author provides case examples of works by history scholars using literature as a historical source: M. V. Nechkina, S. O. Schmidt, L. N. Gumilev, G. R. Naumova. The comparative historical method is applied to demonstrate the inseparable connection between the past and the present, which also allowed to determine the image’s role and to establish a link between epochs. In this regard the artistic image is viewed as a conductor of moral issues, profound emotions, and a kind of “developer” of human activity in history. The artistic image of the city created by the classic authors is analysed as a source for historical perceptions of events, phenomena, and people. The article demonstrates how the heroic characters from the named literary works impacted the formation of the socio-cultural space of Sevastopol.


Keywords:

heritage, source, culture, function, image, literature, war, Crimea, Sevastopol, society


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Al'manakh «Krym». Nauchnyi i obshchestvenno-politicheskii zhurnal. M.: Etnosotsium. 2013. ¹ 1.
2. Gumilev L. N. Mozhet li proizvedenie izyashchnoi slovesnosti byt' istoricheskim istochnikom? // Russkaya literatura. 1972. ¹ 1. S. 73–82.
3. Dubova N. O. Khudozhestvennaya literatura kak istochnik dlya izucheniya sotsial'noi psikhologii // O podlinnosti i dostovernosti istoricheskogo istochnika na primere romana-epopei M. Gor'kogo «Zhizn' Klima Samgina». Kazan', 1991. S. 112–117.
4. Kuntsevskaya G. N. Blagoslovennaya Tavrida. Krym glazami velikikh russkikh pisatelei. Simferopol': Tavriya, 2008. 392 s.
5. Lev Tolstoi ob iskusstve i literature. M.: Sovetskii pisatel', 1958. T. 2.
6. Mironets I. I. Khudozhestvennaya literatura kak istoricheskii istochnik (k istoriografii voprosa) // Istoriya SSSR. 1976. ¹ 1. S. 125–141.
7. Naumova G. R. My stali tishe i vzroslei: o sovremennom otnoshenii k opytu predshestvennikov // XVIII vek v istorii Rossii. Sovremennye kontseptsii istorii Rossii XVIII veka i ikh muzeinaya interpretatsiya / Seriya «Trudy Gosudarstvennogo istoricheskogo muzeya». Vyp. 148. M.: FGUK GIM, 2005. S. 129–136.
8. Nechkina M. V. A. S. Griboedov i dekabristy. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1977. 735 s.
9. Nechkina M. V. Funktsiya khudozhestvennogo obraza v istoricheskom protsesse. M.: Nauka, 1982. 321 s.
10. Otzyv i.d. dotsenta svyashchennika Pavla Florenskogo na sochinenie Andreeva Fedora na temu «Yurii Fedorovich Samarin, kak bogoslov i filosof» // Bogoslovskii vestnik. 1914. T. 1. S. 195–196.
11. Pamyatniki Geroyam Krymskoi voiny. Pamyatnik voinam chetvertogo bastiona, 1905 (avtory – predpolozhitel'no – A. A. Kol'b i O. Enberg). Pamyatnik admiralu P. S. Nakhimovu, 1898 (khudozhnik – A. A. Bil'derling, skul'ptor – I. N. Shreder); vosstanovlen v 1959 (skul'ptor – N. V. Tomskii, arkhitektor – A. V. Aref'ev). Pamyatnik V. A. Kornilovu, 1895; vosstanovlen v 1983 (arkhitektor-khudozhnik – V. G. Gnezdilov, khudozhnik – M. K. Vronskii). Pamyatnik E. I. Totlebenu, 1909 (khudozhnik – A. A. Bil'derling).
12. Tarle E. V. Gorod russkoi slavy. Sevastopol' v 1854–1855 gg. M.: Voenizdat, 1954. 216 s.
13. Tolstoi L. N. Izbrannye pis'ma. 1842–1881 // [Elektronnyi resurs] – URL: http://www.ereading.club/bookreader.php/97280/Tolstoii_18_Tom_18._Izbrannye_pis%27ma_1842-1881.html (data obrashcheniya: 09.04.2015).
14. Tolstoi L. N. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: V 90 t. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1937. T. 47: Dnevniki i zapisnye knizhki 1854–1857. S. 28.
15. Tolstoi L. N. Sevastopol' v dekabre mesyatse // Sevastopol'skie rasskazy // [Elektronnyi resurs] – URL: http://www.ilibrary.ru/text/1161/p.1/index.html (data obrashcheniya: 09.04.2015).
16. Tolstoi L. N. Sevastopol' v mae // Sevastopol'skie rasskazy // [Elektronnyi resurs] – URL: http://www.ilibrary.ru/text/1161/p.1/index.html (data obrashcheniya: 09.04.2015).
17. Filippov M. M. Osazhdennyi Sevastopol' // [Elektronnyi resurs] – URL: http://militera.lib.ru/prose/russian/filippov_mm/index.html (data obrashcheniya: 09.04.2015).
18. Filippova E. I. Khudozhestvennaya literatura kak istochnik dlya etnograficheskogo izucheniya goroda // Sovetskaya etnografiya. 1986. ¹ 3–4. S. 26–36.
19. Shmidt S. O. Pamyatniki pis'mennosti v kul'ture poznaniya istorii Rossii. T. 1: Dopetrovskaya Rus'. Kn. 2. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoi kul'tury, 2008. 406 s; Pamyatniki pis'mennosti v kul'ture poznaniya istorii Rossii. T. 2. Kn. 1. Ot Karamzina do «arbatstva» Okudzhavy. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoi kul'tury, 2009. 576 s.; Put' istorika: Izbrannye trudy po istochnikovedeniyu i istoriografii. M.: RGGU, 1997. 612 s.